TITLE

Pay freeze finally thaws as GPs get unexpected 2.29%

AUTHOR(S)
lacobucci, Gareth
PUB. DATE
April 2009
SOURCE
Pulse;4/8/2009, Vol. 69 Issue 12, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the decision of the Doctors' and Dentists' Review Body (DDRB) that general practitioners (GPs) should receive gross increase of 2.29 percent for 2009 and 2010 in Great Britain. The DDRB reviews evidences from the British Medical Association and the National Health Services employers before giving the decision. It notes the GPs are thankful for the move and consider it as an achievement despite the global recession.
ACCESSION #
38333949

 

Related Articles

  • GPC says pay must rise faster than expenses. Bostock, Nick // GP: General Practitioner;10/24/2008, p7 

    The article reports on the demand of general practitioners (GP) for an increase in their wages due to accelerating practice expenses in Great Britain. The National Health Service (NHS) Information Centre issued a report indicating that the average general medical services (GMS) income per...

  • Two sides are poles apart in pay talks. Praities, Nigel // Pulse;11/7/2007, Vol. 67 Issue 40, p1 

    The article reports on the arguments of the Great Britain National Health Service (NHS) Employers and British Medical Association (BMA) on the pay negotiations for general practitioners (GPs). The NHS Employers reveal that their assessment of a pay rise for GPs differs that of the BMA....

  • MPs blame GPs' pay for NHS debts.  // Pulse;3/22/2007, Vol. 67 Issue 11, p3 

    The article discusses the issue concerning the wages of general practitioners (GPs) in Great Britain. The influential group of members of the Parliament (MPs) has concluded that the pay rises for GPs and other healthcare workers were largely responsible for the National Health Service deficits....

  • GPC urges GPs to fund staff rises. Nowottny, Steve // Pulse;3/22/2007, Vol. 67 Issue 11, p16 

    The article reports that the General Practitioners Committee (GPC) in Great Britain has advised general practitioners (GP) to pay practice staff with an additional 2.5% in 2007. GPC explains that nurses who are employed by the National Health Service will get 1.5% in April and 1% in November....

  • The Nationalized Doctors.  // Time;4/29/1957, Vol. 69 Issue 17, p42 

    The article reports on the instruction written by British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan concerning the increased pay of general practitioners (GPs) at the National Health Service (NHS). It says that Prime Minister Macmillan demanded for a 5% wage increase of the doctors. It states that the...

  • Talks on contract changes running into a brick wall.  // Pulse;9/28/2006, Vol. 66 Issue 36, p2 

    The article offers information on the negotiations about the changes to the general practitioners' (GP) contracts for 2007 with Great Britain National Health Service Employers declining to agree an inflationary pay increase for the next year. General Practitioners Committee negotiators have...

  • GPC to submit case for inflationary rise.  // GP: General Practitioner;9/29/2006, p3 

    The article reports on the decision of the General Practitioners Committee to ask its Review Body to rule on an inflationary pay rise while adding a core change in the income of General Practitioners in Great Britain. As per the contract deal signed with the General Medical Council (GMS) in the...

  • BMA tells patients 'thank you, but the fight goes on'.  // Pulse;9/24/2008, Vol. 68 Issue 32, p14 

    The article reports on the launch of a Support Your Surgery campaign by the British Medical Association (BMA) in Great Britain. The campaign highlights by sending a thank poster and leaflet to general practitioners practice in England. The poster is made to thank the 1.3 million patients who...

  • Young GPs must take tough stance on pensions. Sell, Susie // GP: General Practitioner;3/11/2011, p10 

    The article reports that Andrew Dearden, chairman of the British Medical Association's (BMA) pensions committee, has warned removing protection for National Health Service (NHS) staff whose jobs move to private firms or social enterprises would be a futile attempt to prepare the NHS for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics