TITLE

The Olmsteadian Seizure Clause: The Fourth Amendment and the Seizure of Intangible Property

AUTHOR(S)
OHM, PAUL
PUB. DATE
February 2008
SOURCE
Stanford Technology Law Review;2008, Issue 2, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on several U.S. supreme court cases related to the seizure of intangible property, and discusses the constitutional values of the Seizure Clause as well as the Search Clause of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It discusses the cases such as Olmstead v. United States, Katz v. United States and United States v. Berger, and mentions how the Seizure Clause is interpreted to protect only the physical property rights and to regulate only the deprivation of tangible things. It also discusses the protection of privacy, property and security provided by the Fourth Amendment, and the damaging effects of intangible property rights on an individual's liberty and the privacy of data.
ACCESSION #
37364295

 

Related Articles

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics