TITLE

EPA Raising Barriers to Coal-Fired Power

AUTHOR(S)
Ukeiley, Robert
PUB. DATE
March 2009
SOURCE
Solar Today;Mar2009, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the obstacles facing the proposed coal-fired power plants in the U.S. It says that one of the obstacle is the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) to grant permission to the Deseret Power Electric Cooperative in Utah to operate the Bonanza Power Plant. Mreover, the EAB discovered that the EPA had not provided a rational reason why the greenhouse gases emitted by the power plant is not subjected to an emission limit.
ACCESSION #
36938781

 

Related Articles

  • EPA to finalize power plant carbon rules by mid-summer.  // Energy Daily;1/8/2015, Issue 4, p4 

    The article reports on the announcement by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on January 7, 2015, on the delay in releasing a final rule to establish greenhouse gas new source performance standards for new coal- and natural gas-fired plants until mid-summer of 2015. Topics discussed include...

  • EPA board blocks Utah power plant permit. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;11/24/2008, Vol. 14 Issue 15, p2 

    The article presents information on the blocking of a coal-fired power plant to be opened in Utah by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) board. The appeals board in a decision ordered the EPA to reconsider whether it should issue a federal permit for Deseret Power Electric Cooperative...

  • Efficiency Favored In EPA Greenhouse Guidance To States. HOLLY, CHRIS // Energy Daily;11/12/2010, Issue 217, p1 

    The article focuses on the Clean Air Act regulatory guidance document released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The document recommends emphasis on energy efficiency in determining the most cost-effective greenhouse gas control technologies for utilities. It also stresses the...

  • Clearing the Air. Plumer, Bradford // Audubon;Mar/Apr2012, Vol. 114 Issue 2, p17 

    The article deals with rules imposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reduce mercury pollution and other toxic emissions from coal-burning power plants. Power plants contribute to about half of mercury pollution that affects seafood and causes cognitive problems in children...

  • EPA REQUIRING THREE OKLAHOMA COAL PLANTS TO SCRUB OR USE GAS. Holly, Chris // Coal Power;Mar/Apr2011, p6 

    The article reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a federal implementation plan (FIP) which will require three coal-fired power plants in Oklahoma to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions. The facilities involved include two coal plants owned by Oklahoma Gas & Electric...

  • Experts: EPA Emission Rules to Save Lives.  // State Journal (WV);7/15/2011, Vol. 27 Issue 27, p1 

    The article reports that another round of coal-fired power plant emission reductions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) goes into effect on July 7, 2011.

  • Mercury mockery. Peltier, Robert // Power;Oct2004, Vol. 148 Issue 8, p4 

    Comments on a mercury emissions control regulation for coal-fired power plants proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as of October 2004. Concerns regarding the failure of the U.S. government to provide scientific evidence that links mercury emission to mercury-contaminated fish;...

  • Mercury rules still up in the air.  // Power;Apr2004, Vol. 148 Issue 3, p7 

    Reports on the Utility Mercury Reductions rule proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for coal-fired power plants in the U.S. in 2004. Details of public forums set up by EPA to discuss the proposal; Percentage of mercury emissions that will be reduced after the rules are...

  • Parties praise emissions reduction plan for power plant. BITSOI, ALASTAIR LEE // Navajo Times;7/31/2014, Vol. 53 Issue 31, pA-1 

    The article focuses on the recognition of several technical working groups on the plan of the government agency U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reduce emissions for the 2250 megawatt Navajo Generating Station in Page, Arizona.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics