A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within The EU-ETS Framework

Kemp, A. G.; Kasim, A. S.
January 2008
Energy Journal;2008 Special Issue, p99
Academic Journal
Concerns about the cost of CO2 capture and sequestration, and the effectiveness of carbon abatement policies loom large in discussions on climate change mitigation. Several writers address the issue from various perspectives. This paper attempts to add relative realism to discussions on CO2 capture costs, and, the deployment of carbon capture technology in the UK by using publicly available company data on the long term capacity expansion and CO2 capture investment programmes of selected power plants in the UK. With an estimated £8 billion plan to install a generation capacity of 11 GW and capture capability of 44 MtCO2/year, it is imperative to optimise this huge potential investment. A least-cost optimisation model was formulated and solved with the LP algorithm available in GAMS. The model was then applied to address a number of issues, including the choice of an optimal carbon abatement policy within the EU-ETS framework. The major findings of the study include (a) the long term total cost curve of CO2 capture has three phases -- rising, plateau, rising; (b) alternative capture technologies do not have permanent relative cost advantages or disadvantages; (c) Government incentives encourage carbon capture and the avoidance of emission penalty charges; and (d) the goals of EU-ETS are more effectively realised with deeper cuts in the EUA ratios titan merely hiking the emission penalty, as proposed in EU-ETS Phase II.


Related Articles

  • Land-Use Change and Carbon Sinks. Stavins, Robert N. // Environmental Forum;Nov/Dec2008, Vol. 25 Issue 6, p16 

    The article discusses the costs of carbon sequestration in the U.S. According to the author, benefits of biological sequestration could be achieved through changes in land use patterns. Since the Kyoto Protocol allows sequestration as part of the national strategies to mitigate carbon dioxide...

  • UK Carbon Capture and Storage, Where Is It? Haszeldine, Stuart // Energy & Environment;2012, Vol. 23 Issue 2/3, p437 

    Carbon capture and storage, to capture CO2 from power plants and big industry, remains much publicised, much talked about as an essential action against climate change, and intensively analysed and costed. However only four governments have had the courage to provide actual or allocated...

  • POWERSPAN'S 'missionary work'. McCord, Michael // New Hampshire Business Review;4/23/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p3 

    The article reports on the successful development of the carbon dioxide post-combustion capture technology ECO2 by Portsmouth-based Powerspan Corp. in New Hampshire. It states that ECO2 has been labeled by Frank Alix, chief executive officer (CEO) of Powerspan, as a cost-effective technology...

  • Carbon challenge: Engineers need to come up with a way for people to use fossil fuels without putting C02 into the atmosphere. Gibbins, Jon // Engineer (00137758);2/23/2009, Vol. 294 Issue 7766, p18 

    The article reports on the significant role played by carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies in reducing carbon dioxide emission from fossil fuels in Great Britain. It is believed that CCS will play essential role in capturing carbon dioxide from fossil fuels and fossil fuel power plants...

  • Carbon Dioxide Capture from Air: A Simple Analysis. Brandani, Stefano // Energy & Environment;2012, Vol. 23 Issue 2/3, p319 

    A simplified analysis is presented in order to compare direct capture of carbon dioxide from air, i.e. air capture, and capture from fossil fuelled power plants. For air capture the literature shows conflicting data on the estimates of the costs of the technology, which range from 30 US$/t CO2...


    Carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities coupled to coal-fired power plants provide a climate change mitigation strategy that potentially permits the continued use of coal whilst reducing the carbon dioxide emissions. However, the still-high cost of CCS is one of the major obstacles,...

  • Climate committee warns over cuts to low-carbon research.  // ENDS (Environmental Data Services);Jul2010, Issue 426, p6 

    The article focuses on the call of the Committee on Climate Change to maintain the 550 million British pounds annual low-carbon technology research and development budget. The committee said that the current levels of research and development funding is at a minimum and cuts would affect the new...

  • New CO2-Capture Approaches Push Against Cost Hurdles. Jenkins, Scott // Chemical Engineering;Aug2017, Vol. 124 Issue 8, p14 

    The article reports that despite cost hurdles, carbon dioxide capture technologies continue to advance, driven by the critical role of it in achieving emissions-reduction goals. Topics include the importance of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) within the overall climate change response,...

  • Carbon sequestration: Buried trouble. Van Noorden, Richard // Nature;2/18/2010, Vol. 463 Issue 7283, p871 

    The article focuses on the challenges being faced in the implementation of carbon sequestration, a strategy that could help prevent climatic changes. In describes that in carbon sequestration, also known as carbon capture and storage (CCS), carbon dioxide emitted from factories and power plants...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics