The moral obligations of reasonable non-believers

Morriston, Wes
February 2009
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Feb2009, Vol. 65 Issue 1, p1
Academic Journal
People who do not believe that there is a God constitute an obvious problem for divine command metaethics. They have moral obligations, and are often enough aware of having them. Yet it is not easy to think of such persons as “hearing” divine commands. This makes it hard to see how a divine command theory can offer a completely general account of the nature of moral obligation. The present paper takes a close look at this issue as it emerges in the context of the most recent version of Robert Adams’ modified divine command theory. I argue that, despite a valiant attempt to do so, Adams does not succeed in giving an adequate account of the moral obligations of non-believers. More generally, I claim that if divine commands are construed as genuine speech acts, theists are well advised not to adopt a divine command theory.


Related Articles

  • God's moral goodness and supererogation. Drummond Young, Elizabeth // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2013, Vol. 73 Issue 2, p83 

    What do we understand by God's goodness? William Alston claims that by answering this question convincingly, divine command theory can be strengthened against some major objections. He rejects the idea that God's goodness lies in the area of moral obligations. Instead, he proposes that God's...

  • "How Can I Know God's Will?".  // Tennessee Tribune;8/18/2011, Vol. 22 Issue 33, p4B 

    The article provides an answer to the question of how to know God's will.

  • THE PREMATURE DISMISSAL OF VOLUNTARISM. Flannagan, Matthew // Colloquium: The Australian & New Zealand Theological Review;May2010, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p38 

    The author discusses the Divine Command theory. He explores the influential examples of the Divine Command as well as its role in ethics. He examines the concept of voluntarism of philosopher Peter Singer, who argues that the acceptance of the process entails that paradigmatically-evil actions...

  • A doctor probes the how and why of mystical experience. Meecham, Will // National Catholic Reporter;11/25/2005, Vol. 42 Issue 6, p22 

    Presents views by the author regarding the uniqueness in the existence of God in every person. Personal encounter with God; Discussions on peoples view of Divine experience; Influence of advanced knowledge on the person's discretion of divinity.

  • Commanding and Obeying: Some Aspects of Nomological Ethics in Christian Philosophy. DOOMEN, Jasper // Soter;2012, Vol. 41 Issue 69, p7 

    In this article, it is inquired which reasons are decisive for acting in accordance with divine commands, and whether these can be regarded as moral reasons; the emphasis lies on Christianity. To this effect, the position of God as a - basic - lawgiver is expounded, with special attention to the...

  • SOME MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT MORALITY.  // Morality for Moderns;1996, Vol. 36, preceding p28 

    Section 1 of Chapter 2 of the book "Morality for Moderns," by Corbin Fowler is presented. It explores the misconception on morality wherein individuals commonly relate it with religion. It argues that the statement which asserts that moral value is influenced by the divine belongs to the past....

  • Divine Authority. Werpehowski, William // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Nov2013, Issue 237, p58 

    A review of the book "God and Moral Obligation," by C. Stephen Evans, is presented.

  • LA SUSPENSIÓN DE LA ÉTICA EN EL MALESTAR DE LA LIBERTAD: LO DIVINO Y EL DESTINO. Valentim, Inácio // Teocomunicação;jan-jun2012, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p119 

    The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the ethical-practical conflict in the relation between the divine-fate and human beings. The incessant search for liberty and knowledge by human beings has been the principal factor in the suspension of the ethic. This freedom and wisdom invaded and...

  • DIVINE COMMAND THEORY IN THE PASSAGE OF HISTORY. RAHIMI, SIMIN // Forum Philosophicum;Autumn2009, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p307 

    Are actions that are morally good, morally good because God makes them so (e.g., by commanding them)? Or does God urge humans to do them because they are morally good anyway? What is, in general, the relationship between divine commands and ethical duties? It is not an uncommon belief among...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics