Limits to Campaign Spending--I: A Questionable Reform

April 1979
America;4/7/1979, Vol. 140 Issue 13, p281
The article examines the proposal for a campaign spending ceiling on Congressional elections as part of a public financing program being introduced by the U.S. Congress. Arguments in favor and against limiting campaign spending are presented. It is argued that with the benefits of limiting campaign spending uncertain, it would seem better not to impose a ceiling. On the other hand, although the spending ceiling in U.S. Congressional program is questionable, the principle of public financing of congressional elections is argued to be correct.


Related Articles

  • Should Taxpayers Pay for Political Conventions? Cole, Tom // U.S. News Digital Weekly;8/24/2012, Vol. 4 Issue 34, p18 

    The author argues that U.S. taxpayers should not pay for political conventions. He comments on the argument that a public financing system lessens corporate and special interest influences. The author also explains how public financing has failed as a method for limiting the influence of private...

  • Should Taxpayers Pay for Political Conventions? Holman, Craig // U.S. News Digital Weekly;8/24/2012, Vol. 4 Issue 34, p18 

    The author argues that U.S. taxpayers should pay for political conventions. He describes changes in the national nominating conventions, which are characterized by unlimited corporate dollars. He presents a background of the creation of the presidential public financing system in 1974. The...

  • In Washington, money talks louder than ordinary Americans. Lessig, Lawrence // New Statesman;5/29/2015, Vol. 144 Issue 5264, p64 

    An opinion piece is presented in which the author argues that public elections in the U.S. should be funded by public money. Topics discussed include the influence held by those who donate to politicians, the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and the U.S....

  • Front-runners for Kirk's Illinois seat are lagging in money chase. Blake, Aaron // Hill;10/22/2009, Vol. 16 Issue 123, p20 

    The article reports that U.S. Representative Mark Kirk's competitors are lagging with each other through the total amount raised during fundraising which include Dan Seals, Beth Coulson and Julie Hamos.

  • When Campaign Cash Is Left Unspent. Newton-Small, Jay // Time;11/1/2010, Vol. 176 Issue 18, p16 

    The article discusses the November 2010 midterm elections in the U.S., extra funds that candidates have in their campaign treasuries, and the dispensation of these funds to other candidates and charities by incumbents like Senator Evan Bayh who have chosen not to run for re-election.

  • Unions' $100M to save the Dems. Bogardus, Kevin; Miller, Sean J. // Hill;5/21/2010, Vol. 17 Issue 57, p1 

    The article reports on the plan of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) to spend close to 100 million U.S. dollars on the 2010 election in the U.S.

  • Reviews. Cornwell, Gary // Government Information Quarterly;1999, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p195 

    Reviews the book `United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997: The Official Results of the Elections of the 1st Through 105th Congress,' by Michael J. Dubin.

  • SO YOU WANT TO BUY AN ELECTION? Murphy, Tim // Mother Jones;Jan/Feb2012, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p23 

    A satirical flowchart is presented regarding how to navigate U.S. campaign finance.

  • Money and Virtue.  // America;9/4/1926, Vol. 35 Issue 21, p487 

    The article reflects on the practice by political candidates in Pennsylvania and Illinois to spend great amount of money during their campaigns. It compares the amount of campaign funds expended by U.S. politicians to British politicians, emphasizing that the latter spent remarkably less. It...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics