TITLE

RULING WARNS FUNDS TO FOLLOW CLASS ACTIONS

AUTHOR(S)
Nicholas, Blair A.; Berg, Ian D.
PUB. DATE
December 2008
SOURCE
Pensions & Investments;12/8/2008, Vol. 36 Issue 25, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that according to a ruling by the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, institutional investors are expected to have procedures and policies in place to monitor securities class actions in which they have a financial interest. The decision was given in the case, Larson vs. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Judge Richard A. Posner denied the Colorado pension system's motion to intervene as untimely.
ACCESSION #
35847789

 

Related Articles

  • No Religious Right to Insubordination. Danaher, Maria Greco // HR Magazine;Sep2003, Vol. 48 Issue 9, p146 

    Provides information on two cases in which the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an employer's right to terminate an employee who refused to perform assigned duties for religious reasons. Difference between an employee seeking an accommodation to his religious faith and an employee...

  • Court Dismisses Interference and Conspiracy Claims.  // Benefits Magazine;May2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p54 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has dismissed the plaintiffs' claim of interference with attainment of retirement benefits and a related conspiracy claim. The court considered the plaintiffs' claim that the defendant planned to interfere with the...

  • Legal Challenge to Faith-Based Initiative Is Revived. Trotter, Andrew // Education Week;1/25/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 20, p25 

    The article reports that a federal appeals court has reinstated a lawsuit that challenges activities of the centers for faith-based initiatives in the U.S. Department of Education and other U.S. agencies. The centers are a key part of the Bush administration's push to promote the inclusion of...

  • ERIC Urges Rejection of Class in Stable Value Suit.  // Plan Advisor News;2013, p103 

    The article reports that the ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) has urged the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reject class certification in a lawsuit alleging fiduciary breach claims on stable value fund investments in money market funds. It requests the court to affirm a lower court ruling...

  • RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. Amalgamated Bank (11-166).  // Federal Lawyer;Aug2012, Vol. 59 Issue 7, p61 

    The article discusses the decision given by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the seventh circuit in the RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. Amalgamated Bank case.

  • High Level Managers Counted As Employees for Title VII Coverage.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q3, p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the case Smith v. Castaways Family Diner. The trial court has reinstated a Title VII lawsuit against an employer after holding that two high level managers should be considered employees. The reasons behind the...

  • Rolling the Dice with Unsecured Creditors' Money: Creditors' Committee Fails To Protect Proceeds of Avoidance Actions. Cohen, Scott E. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q1, p1 

    The article presents information on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in the case In re Qualitech Steel Corp. The Court affirmed the decision of a bankruptcy court order that grants prepetition secured creditors the proceeds from avoidance actions as adequate...

  • Vasquez v. United States (11-199).  // Federal Lawyer;Jun2012, Vol. 59 Issue 5, p66 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Vasquez v. United States, wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has rejected the appeal of plaintiff Alexander Vasquez, favoring his conviction of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine.

  • Shepard v. Madigan. Scrivner, Ben // Urban Lawyer;Spring2014, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p414 

    The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit's determination in the 2013 case Shepard v. Madigan that there is no basis for relief stemming from the interim enforcement of a state's gun law, which was held to be unconstitutional, during the interval between the law's...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics