TITLE

Whose Shame?

PUB. DATE
February 1916
SOURCE
America;2/19/1916, Vol. 14 Issue 19, p446
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on an article that attempts to defend the style of woman's dress on grounds such as cleanliness, healthfulness and beauty, in which the writer of the said article stated that the shame be on the person who finds evil therein. It cites that it is not prudery but purity to identify immorality even where it disguises as morality. It says that there are styles of dress from which the modest eye will turn away ashamed, and the shame is not his who finds them wrong, but hers whose moral ideas are so demoralized as to think them good.
ACCESSION #
34765639

 

Related Articles

  • Right as Opposed to Wrong as Opposed to Left: The Spatial Location of "Right Parties" on the Israeli Political Map. Doron, Gideon // Israel Studies;Fall2005, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p29 

    This article informs that politics is a dynamic process constantly changing directions and emphases; adjusting and readjusting to altering circumstances. People directly involved in this process relentlessly engage in a never-ending process of defining and redefining objectives and interests, of...

  • Literature. TALBOT, FRANCIS // America;3/9/1929, Vol. 40 Issue 22, p531 

    The article talks about the supporters or advocates of immorality. It refers, primarily, to the writers who have developed a philosophy of obscenity and have upheld their rights to propagate their ideas. These writers believe that sins of the flesh are merely forms of self-expression and that...

  • The Homesickness of the Soul.  // America;8/14/1915, Vol. 13 Issue 18, p448 

    The author reflects on the closing of the Sunday discussion in the New York "Sun" which refers to the immortality of the soul. Offered is a statement in the Sunday discussion and its meaning which is the homesickness of the soul. The author states that the whereabouts of a person is not a...

  • ON THE FUNdAMENTAL EViL Of FRAGMENTATiON. MiLLER, EDMUNd B. // New Oxford Review;Sep2014, Vol. 81 Issue 7, p27 

    The article offers the author's insights about the fundamental evil of fragmentation. The author talks abous his life as a junior-high teacher and an adviser to hardened mothers and fathers not to kill their preborn children. He also emphasizes that one must see one's relationship to others in...

  • Why moral paradoxes matter? 'Teflon immorality' and the perversity of life. Smilansky, Saul // Philosophical Studies;Aug2013, Vol. 165 Issue 1, p229 

    'Teflon immorality'' (or TI) is immorality that goes on unchecked-the wrongdoing is not stopped and its perpetrators, beyond the reach of punishment or other sanction, often persist in their immoral ways. The idea that the immoral prosper has been recognized as morally (and legally) disturbing...

  • Bully (Guest Voice).  // Moderate Voice;5/11/2012, p2 

    The article presents the author's insights on bullying. The author states that although bullying provides enjoyment, it is considered downright evil and immoral. Meanwhile, the author mentions his experience of bullying until the end of his high school days in which he shifted his focus to those...

  • Contractualism and Our Duties to Nonhuman Animals. Talbert, Matthew // Environmental Ethics;Summer2006, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p201 

    The influential account of contractualist moral theory offered recently by T. M. Scanlon in What We Owe to Each Other is not intended to account for all the various moral commitments that people have; it covers only a narrow—though important—range of properly moral concerns and...

  • Chapter 6: Good and Bad in Professional Responsibility. Guttmann, David // Ethics in Social Work: A Context of Caring;2006, p101 

    Chapter 6 of the book "Ethics in Social Work: A Context of Caring" is presented. It discussed approaches to moral philosophy regarding good and bad behavior toward an individual's fellow human. Philosopher Martin Buber referred to the concepts of good and bad as they are reflected in Chapters 1...

  • Knowing good and doing good. Gaylin, Willard // Hastings Center Report;May/Jun94, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p36 

    Focuses on the moral philosophy of knowing good and doing good. Nonexistence of a direct quantitative relationship between knowing good and doing good; Concept of free will; Rationality; Role of emotions in changing behavior; Moral dilemmas and the value of knowledge.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics