TITLE

Campbell found guilty, receives 20-year sentence

AUTHOR(S)
Treul, Don
PUB. DATE
July 2008
SOURCE
Breckenridge American;7/12/2008, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the jury has found Richard L. Campbell guilty of one count of sexual assault of a child under 17. The jury also imposed a 20-year prison sentence to Campbell but has decided not to add any fine to the punishment. The victim who suffers from autism, reveals that he feels good that Campbell has been found guilty. It offers an overview of the trial.
ACCESSION #
33464279

 

Related Articles

  • Former Zimbabwean president sentenced to 10 years for rape. Machipisa, Lewis // New York Amsterdam News;01/28/99, Vol. 90 Issue 5, p2 

    Reports on the January 10, 1998 sentencing of former Zimbabwean President Canaan Banana to ten years in prison for 11 counts of homosexual rape. Terms of the sentence; Appeal launched by Banana's lawyer against the conviction.

  • A preview: What the Court will consider.  // Human Rights;Spring92, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p9 

    Presents rulings made by the U.S. Supreme Court during its 1991-1992 term on several human rights cases. In the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. versus Lee, at issue is whether religious groups soliciting money fall under First Amendment protection of solicitation as speech,...

  • Scotland: no more rapist cross-examining victims. Manzano, Angie; Eastlick, Megan // Off Our Backs;Nov2000, Vol. 30 Issue 10, p3 

    Reports on the proposal to close the legal loophole that allows men on trial for rape to cross-examine their victims in court in Scotland.

  • Grindr case sent to trial. Hainsworth, Jeremy // Xtra West (Vancouver);5/5/2011, Issue 462, p16 

    The article reports on the trial of a court case in Vancouver, British Columbia wherein a 55-year-old man was charged with sexual interference, invitation to sexual touching and sexual assault.

  • Homicide: Consent and Horseplay. Fafinski, Stefan // Journal of Criminal Law;Oct2005, Vol. 69 Issue 5, p394 

    The article presents information on the case law R vs. A concerning liability for unlawful dangerous act manslaughter. The defendant, a co-defendant and the victim, all aged 16, were in the same school year. The defendant and co-defendant picked up the victim, lifted him over a railing by the...

  • United States v. Booker and United States v. Fanfan: The Tireless March of Apprendi and the Intracourt Battle To Save Sentencing Reform. Bloom, Douglas B. // Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review;Summer2005, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p539 

    This article discusses U.S. court cases on legislative control over sentencing decisions. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Apprendi versus New Jersey marked the beginning of a dramatically new role for the criminal jury. The Court, in an effort to protect the democratic voice in the...

  • STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF CASES CONCERNING RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN DRUG SENTENCING: STEPHENS V. STATE AND U.S. V. ARMSTRONG. Gastwirth, Joseph L.; Nayak, Tapan K. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter97, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p583 

    The article presents information on the statistical aspects of cases concerning racial discrimination in drug sentences. Statistical evidence has been accepted in a wide variety of legal cases, including trademark confusion, product liability and jury and employment discrimination. Ever since...

  • Supreme Court Cases of Interest. FREEMAN, CAROL GARFIEL // Criminal Justice;Spring2011, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p45 

    The article presents U.S. Supreme Court cases regarding decisions on denial or grant of certiorari as of March 2011. It cites the Wong v. Smith case which was denied certiorari where the court of appeals had granted habeas relief based on alleged coercive comments on evidence by a state court...

  • Misfaxed Papers Stop Asbestos Trial: Jury dismissed after plaintiffs' lawyers receive jury-selection information. Hansen, Mark // ABA Journal;Aug91, Vol. 77 Issue 8, p22 

    Reports on the postponement of an asbestos liability trial after defense lawyers in the case misfaxed a secret document detailing their jury-selection strategy to a lawyer for one of the plaintiffs. Background of the asbestos liability case; Baltimore Court Judge Marshall A. Levin's dismissal...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics