TITLE

Accreditation Status of U.S. Military Graduate Medical Education Programs

AUTHOR(S)
De Lorenzo, Robert A.
PUB. DATE
July 2008
SOURCE
Military Medicine;Jul2008, Vol. 173 Issue 7, p635
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Context: Military graduate medical education (GME) comprises a substantial fraction of U.S. physician training capacity. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have placed substantial stress on military medicine, and lay and professional press accounts have raised awareness of the effects on military GME. To date, however, objective data on military GME quality remains sparse. Objective: Determine the accreditation status of U.S. military GME programs. Additionally, military GME program data will be compared to national (U.S.) accreditation lengths. Design: Retrospective review of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) data. Participants: All military-sponsored core programs in specialties with at least three residencies were included. Military-affilliated but civilian-sponsored programs were excluded. Outcome measures: The current and past cycle data were used for the study. For each specialty, the current mean accreditation length and the net change in cycle was calculated. National mean accreditation lengths by specialty for 2005 to 2006 were obtained from the ACGME. Comparison between the overall mean national and military accreditation lengths was performed with a z test. All other comparisons employed descriptive statistics. Results: Ninety-nine military programs in 15 specialties were included in the analysis. During the study period, 1 program was newly accredited, and 6 programs had accreditation withdrawn or were closed. The mean accreditation length of the military programs was 4.0 years. The overall national mean for the same specialties is 3.5 years (p < 0.01). In previous cycles, 68% of programs had accreditation of 4 years or longer, compared to 70% in the current cycle, while 13% had accreditation of 2 years or less in the previous cycle compared to 14% in the current cycle. Ten (68%) of the military specialties had mean accreditation lengths greater than the national average, while 5 (33%) were below it. Ten (68%) specialties had stable or improving cycle lengths when compared to previous cycles. Conclusion: Military GME accreditation cycle lengths are, overall, longer than national averages. Trends show many military programs are experiencing either stable or slightly lengthening accreditation compared to previous cycles. A few specialties show a declining trend. There has been a modest 5% decline in the number of military core residency programs since 2000.
ACCESSION #
33337843

 

Related Articles

  • Meet the Staff: Amanda Banninga.  // Judicial Division Record;Spring2014, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p10 

    The author discusses her appointment as a Judicial Division Program Associate and mentions topics like her education background, upcoming duties of her position, and her past career with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

  • UNITING AN ACCREDITATION SYSTEM.  // Medical Economics;12/10/2012, Vol. 89 Issue 23, p19 

    The article reports that the U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine have pledged to work toward defining a process, format, and timetable for the new system.

  • A proposal to revise resident duty hours, supervision policies.  // AHA News;6/28/2010, Vol. 46 Issue 13, p1 

    The article reports on the proposed standards issued by a task force of the U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education revising supervision and duty hour requirements for residents released in June 2010.

  • Residency Training at a Crossroads. Giri, Badri // Annals of Internal Medicine;6/7/2011, Vol. 154 Issue 11, p779 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article on the changes mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) by Volpp and colleagues in the previous issue.

  • Study Shows Potential Impact of Graduate Medical Education Funding Cuts.  // American Family Physician;12/15/2011, Vol. 84 Issue 12, p1409 

    The article suggests that reductions to graduate medical education funding could negatively impact core residency programs, which include family and general medicine, according to the findings of a 2011 study by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).

  • News and Views.  // Journal of Palliative Medicine;Oct2008, Vol. 11 Issue 8, p1062 

    The article offers news briefs related to palliative medicine. According to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 57 fellowship programs have applied for accreditation. The palliative care for nonmalignant disease has gained more votes, in which the doctors can introduce...

  • Stamp of approval. Jesitus, John // Dermatology Times;Dec2008, Vol. 29 Issue 12, p30 

    The article reports on the recognition of Accredition Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to validate procedural fellowships in the U.S. According to a Moh surgeon, the recognition from ACGME gives structure and standardization to surgical dermatology training. Doctor Randall K....

  • What Are the Pathology Education Requirements for All Nonpathology ACGME-Accredited Programs in an Academic Center? Bean, Sarah M.; Nagler, Alisa; Buckley, Patrick J. // American Journal of Clinical Pathology;Sep2012, Vol. 138 Issue 3, p327 

    This study aimed to determine institution-wide graduate medical education (GME) requirements in pathology (exclusive of pathology residency and fellowships) at an academic center. All documents related to residency review committee (RRC) program requirements were searched for the key words...

  • A case study of translating ACGME practice-based learning and improvement requirements into reality: systems quality improvement projects as the key component to a comprehensive curriculum. A M Tomolo // Postgraduate Medical Journal;Oct2009, Vol. 85 Issue 1008, p530 

    BACKGROUND: In 2002, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced a new requirement: residents must demonstrate competency in Practice-Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI). Training in this domain is still not consistently integrated into programmes, with few, if...

  • Clinical audit in nuclear medicine. Mirzaei, Siroos; Maffioli, Lorenzo; Hilson, Andrew // European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging;Jan2011, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p3 

    The author reflects on the study of nuclear medicine and its new procedures and materials. He relates that nuclear medicine is defined in the U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) program as a medical specialty which uses the tracer principle. The author mentions that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics