TITLE

Supreme Court Rules Against D.C. Gun-control Law

PUB. DATE
July 2008
SOURCE
New American (08856540);7/21/2008, Vol. 24 Issue 15, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the decision of U.S. Supreme Court over the District of Columbia's Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975. By handing down a 5-4 decision in the case of District of Columbia versus Heller, the high court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which had struck down provisions of that law as unconstitutional.
ACCESSION #
33303587

 

Related Articles

  • Incorporation Doesn't Guarantee Exclusive Use of Name.  // Nonprofit World;Sep/Oct2007, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p7 

    The article reports on the ruling of the District of Columbia Appeals Court regarding the case of using the corporate name by the act of incorporation. The court ruled that the act of incorporation does not give an organization the exclusive right to use the corporate name. It started when a...

  • NLRB REMAINS WINLESS IN RECENT RULEMAKING LITIGATION: D.C. CIRCUIT STRIKES DOWN NLRB'S NOTICE POSTING RULE.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2013 Q2, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit invalidating the ruling of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) requiring all U.S. private employers to post a notice informing employees of their right under the National Labor Relations Act. The D.C....

  • MICHAEL HARTMAN, FRANK KORMANN, PIERCE MCINTOSH, NORMAN ROBBINS, AND ROBERT EDWARDS, PETITIONERS v. WILLIAM G. MOORE, JR.: ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Hartman v. Moore, case number 04-1495, argued on January 10, 2006 and decided on April 26, 2006. It presents the judgment pronounced by the U.S. Supreme Court. The court said that it is a Bivens action against criminal investigators...

  • Foreign Plaintiffs Can Recover Treble Damages Against Global Cartels Under U. S. Antitrust Law. Egge, Michael G.; Lipsky, Tad; Williamson, Marcellus; Wright, Joel D. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q1, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the case Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffman LaRoche Ltd. in January 2003 that purchasers damaged by a global cartel may sue under the U.S. antitrust law. As a result of the case, the U.S. could...

  • A review of end-of-term tax cases. Jones, George G.; Luscombe, Mark A. // Accounting Today;8/6/2007, Vol. 21 Issue 14, p11 

    The article offers information on several tax cases in the U.S. The U.S. Supreme Court has decided to deny certiorari in the case of Macy's Department Stores Inc. versus City and County of San Francisco in California. In the case Murphy versus the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS), it has been...

  • A SHOT at the Second Amendment. Gibeaut, John // ABA Journal;Nov2007, Vol. 93 Issue 11, p50 

    The article reports that the decision on March 9, 2007 by a split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has marked the first time that a federal appellate court used the Second Amendment to invalidate a gun-control regulation. The district has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to...

  • Legal Barricade Removed: New Ozone and Particulate Matter Standard to Move Forward. Amandes, Christopher B.; Anderson, Jed P.; Nettles, Larry W. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q1, p1 

    The article presents information on the ruling handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court rejecting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit's ruling in favor of the American Trucking Association, which challenged the national ambient air quality standards for ozone and fine particulate matter...

  • NO WAY OUT. Savit, Mark // Coal Age;Sep2006, Vol. 111 Issue 9, p48 

    The article focuses on a ruling of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that the U.S. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission did not have the power to review the decision of the secretary of the U.S. Dept. of Labor to cite operator Twentymile Coal in addition to a...

  • Court confirms $10,000 limit on surety claims.  // Commercial Carrier Journal;Aug2010, Vol. 167 Issue 8, p39 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed that an insurance company's liability under a 10,000-dollars surety bond provided to freight broker Sam's Transportation is limited at a total of 10,000-dollars and not at...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics