TITLE

Searches and Stale Law, Plus a Look at Coming Attractions

AUTHOR(S)
Stadnyk, Sophia M.
PUB. DATE
June 2008
SOURCE
State & Local Law News;Summer2008, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the appealed case concerning the Supreme Court's decision to an issue on the admissibility of evidence which was obtained inherent to a lawful arrest. In considering the decision of Virginia court and re-appreciation of the facts of the case, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded lower court decision. The court penned that by virtue of the Constitution, a warrantless arrest of a person for crimes committed in the presence of the arresting officer is valid.
ACCESSION #
33293928

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court Changes Vehicle Search Rules. Hodsdon, Richard // Sheriff;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 61 Issue 5/6, p68 

    The article discusses a court case where a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court to change the operation of law enforcement during search incidents in the arrest of persons in motor vehicles in the U.S. It notes that the policies, procedures, and practices of law enforcement must change. It...

  • CASE UPDATES.  // NARF Legal Review;Winter/Spring2010, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p9 

    The article offers updates on court cases in the U.S. A settlement of the court case Nick, et al. v. Bethel, et. al was jointly announced by Alaska state officials along with the Native American Rights Fund (NARF), the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Northern Justice Project. A review...

  • SUPREME DECISION. HERTZ, BETH THOMAS // Medical Economics;5/25/2012, Vol. 89 Issue 10, p24 

    The article presents information on how the U.S. Supreme Court decision on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in June 2012 will have an impact on primary care physicians (PCPs). The rulings may include--that the entire law is acceptable constitutionally, the...

  • STERN LESSON: THE U.S. SUPREME COURT CALLS INTO QUESTION THE JURISDICTION OF BANKRUPTCY COURTS. Hillen, Noah G. // Advocate (05154987);Jan2012, Vol. 55 Issue 1, p33 

    The article discusses the jurisdiction of bankruptcy courts in the U.S. in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the case Stern v. Marshall in June 2011. It states that the court in the Stern case determined that Section 157(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act...

  • SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.  // Journal of Law & Education;Apr2012, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p363 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court decisions decided prior to April 1, 2012. Topics of the cases include private school tuition under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the suspension of a student for off-campus speech, and the constitutionality of...

  • THE RIGHT TO REFUSE: SHOULD PRISON INMATES BE ALLOWED TO DISCONTINUE TREATMENT FOR INCURABLE, NONCOMMUNICABLE MEDICAL CONDITIONS? Mendelsohn, Daniel R. H. // Maryland Law Review;2011, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p295 

    The article discusses the right of a prisoner to refuse or discontinue medical treatment for an incurable and non-communicable medical problem as of August 2011. A free citizen's right to refuse treatment is reportedly covered by the U.S. Constitution, but the rights of a prisoner are limited...

  • THE FOUR PILLARS OF CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE. Sherry, Suzanna // Cardozo Law Review;Jan2011, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p969 

    The article elaborates the four fundamental principles of the U.S. constitutional doctrine. It recalls the legal analysis, judicial craftmanship, constitutional aspiration, and the human understanding. It provides a practical illustration of these essential pillars by using them to test the...

  • The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law. Cohen-Eliya, Moshe; Porat, Iddo // San Diego Law Review;Spring2009, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p367 

    The article discusses District of Columbia v. Heller, a Supreme Court case which concentrates on the law regarding gun control and the proportionality approach in American constitutional law. It describes the unique attributes of the use of foreign law in the Heller dissent. It argues that...

  • The Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Exclusionary Rule in the United States. Cammack, Mark E. // American Journal of Comparative Law;2010 Supplement, Vol. 58, p631 

    In 1961 the United States Supreme Court held in Mapp v. Ohio that the exclusion of evidence obtained as a result of an unconstitutional search or seizure is required in state criminal trials as a matter of federal constitutional law. Two further cases decided in 1964 and 1966 created federal...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics