June 2000
ENR: Engineering News-Record;06/26/2000, Vol. 244 Issue 25, p24
Trade Publication
Deals with a report from the United States General Accounting Office which found that the reforms of the Superfund hazardous waste cleanup program of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have not been as successful as EPA claimed. Number of Superfund reforms classified by the EPA as having actual benefits to the program; Reaction to the findings; Opinion on the administrative reforms.


Related Articles

  • EPA APPROVES TWO-SITE REMEDY.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;04/12/99, Vol. 242 Issue 14, p15 

    Reports on the plans of the United States Environmental Protection Agency for a pump-and-treat cleanup for neighboring Superfund sites in Torrance, California. Details on the plan; Information on the soil and water contamination at the sites; List of the potentially responsible parties in the...

  • Superfund Slowdown. Kriz, Margaret // National Journal;6/1/2002, Vol. 34 Issue 22, p1623 

    Deals with the lack of progress made by the Superfund toxic-waste cleanup program in the U.S.. Reasons behind the program's lack of progress; Number of toxic site cleanup completed by the Environmental Protection Agency since 1980; Genesis of the Superfund program; Demands of industry lobbyists...

  • EPA Relaxes RCRA Rules. Franz, Neil // Chemical Week;1/24/2001, Vol. 163 Issue 4, p49 

    Reports on the move of the United States Environmental Protection Agency to ease the rules for compliance with its hazardous waste remediation program. Effects of the changes on cleanup requirements under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Provisions under the reform.

  • The socioeconomic dimensions of brownfield cleanup in the Detroit region. Lee, Sangyun; Mohai, Paul // Population & Environment;Mar2013, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p420 

    Although the goal of brownfield development is to clean up and redevelop abandoned or underutilized properties in distressed urban neighborhoods, the racial and socioeconomic disparities of brownfield cleanups have not been adequately examined. This study combines the locations of brownfields...

  • Superfund: Candidly speaking. Grumbly, Thomas P. // EPA Journal;Jul/Aug91, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p19 

    Analyzes the improvements needed for the programs of the Superfund program in 1990. Understanding of why US Congress authorized the program; Evaluation of the program's success according to definitions by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Prospects for changing strategic program plans.

  • EPA moving ahead with plans for final HWIR by fall 1997. Heiss, Glenn // Chemical Market Reporter;1/20/97, Vol. 251 Issue 3, p15 

    Reports that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to issue a final rule by fall of 1997 that will help streamline cleanups of contaminated media under the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act. Efforts by a multi-industry coalition of hazardous waste generators to change the...

  • EPA Proposes Delay of Controversial TMDL Program.  // Chemical Market Reporter;8/13/2001, Vol. 260 Issue 7, p4 

    Reports on the proposal of the United States Environmental Protection Agency to delay the effective data of a controversial rule to identify and remediate impaired waters. Estimated cost of waterways restoration under the revised total maximum daily load (TMDL); Requirements under the TMDL program.

  • Lawmakers Concerned Over Superfund Sites.  // Chemical Market Reporter;2/25/2002, Vol. 261 Issue 8, p28 

    Reports on the concerns expressed by legislators in the U.S. House of Representatives on the reduction in the number of Superfund toxic waste sites in which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) planned to clean up. Letter sent by the legislators to EPA administrator Christie Whitman;...

  • Superfund Report Details Funding Cuts. Sissell, Kara // Chemical Week;7/3/2002, Vol. 164 Issue 27, p13 

    Reports on the list of Superfund sites released by lawmakers that the Bush administration has decided not to fund in fiscal year 2003, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Chemical plants included in the list; Criticism on the report.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics