TITLE

Revenge, Retribution, and Values: Social Attitudes and Punitive Sentencing

AUTHOR(S)
McKee, Ian R.; Feather, N. T.
PUB. DATE
June 2008
SOURCE
Social Justice Research;Jun2008, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p138
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This study examined the pattern of relations between vengeance attitudes, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and social dominance orientation (SDO) using the structure of value types proposed by Schwartz ( Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65, 1992). Relations between these variables and support for a variety of sentencing options, including capital punishment, were then investigated. One hundred and forty-eight students in Adelaide, South Australia, completed a Vengeance Scale (Stuckless and Goranson, J Soc Behav Pers 7:25–42, 1992), measures of RWA and SDO, the Schwartz Value Survey (1992), and a Sentencing Goals Scale. As predicted, vengeance attitudes and SDO were found to be positively related to the importance of power values and negatively related to the importance of universalism and benevolence values. Vengeance attitudes were negatively related to rehabilitation and positively related to support for retribution and incapacitation sentencing goals, while RWA was positively related to the endorsement of deterrence and incapacitation as sentencing goals. Regression analyses indicated that only RWA and vengeance attitudes were unique predictors of death penalty support. Results provide support for the suggestion that vengeance is closely associated with our notion of retributive justice.
ACCESSION #
33042234

 

Related Articles

  • You be the Judge. Donaldson, William // Saturday Evening Post;10/15/1955, Vol. 228 Issue 16, p68 

    Focuses on the rule that a convict serving his sentence may be tried and sentenced for a crime committed either prior or subsequent to the conviction under which he is enduring punishment, based on a decision made by a Georgia court in 1931.

  • The NCSC Sentencing Attitudes Survey: A Report on the Findings.  // Indiana Law Journal;2007 Special Issue, Vol. 82, p1319 

    The article deals with the findings of the NCSC Sentencing Attitudes Survey, a national poll of 1,502 randomly selected adults that thoroughly examines the American public's views toward sentencing and related issues in an objective manner. The survey reveals that Americans are neither...

  • Sentencing In Australia. Zdenkowski, George // Legaldate;May2009, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p5 

    This article deals with some aspects of sentencing in Australia. Retributivism and utilitarianism are the two broad punishment theories. The terms retribution and denunciation, deterrence, rehabilitation and incapacitation are used in sentencing purposes across the region. It discusses the...

  • THE RELATIVE INDEPENDENCE OF PUNISHMENT THEORY. DAVIS, MICHAEL // Law & Philosophy;1988/1989, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p321 

    The article presents preconditions to the punishment theory for a better understanding of the logical justification of punishment. It reviews legal punishment, punishment in general and criminal punishment and the three senses to justify criminal punishment including justification of criminal...

  • Mandatory Minimums in the Federal System: Turning a Blind Eye to Justice. Price, Mary // Human Rights;Winter2004, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p8 

    Focuses on mandatory minimum sentencing in the criminal code of the U. S. Opposition of the American Bar Association to mandatory sentencing; Standard of sentencing alternatives and procedures; Comparison between the U.S. sentencing guidelines and the mandatory minimums.

  • THINKING INSIDE THE BOX: PLACING FORM OVER FUNCTION IN THE APPLICATIONS OF THE STATUTORY SENTENCING PROCEDURE IN STATE OF MAINE v EUGENE DOWNS. Lane, Matthew E. // Maine Law Review;2008, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p588 

    The article reports on the application of statutory sentencing procedure in the case, State of Main v. Eugene Downs. This case is an example of sentencing procedure in title 17-A, section 1252-C wherein a sentencing judge follow a process that is inadequate for the task at hand. Meanwhile,...

  • Life Sentences on The Rise in the United States. St. Gerard, Vanessa // Corrections Today;Jul2004, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p17 

    Reports on the increase in the number of offenders sentenced to life in prison in the U.S. in the 1990s. Number of offenders who had life sentences in 1992; Increase in the amount of time served by offenders given life sentences; Percentage of inmates serving life sentences in New York.

  • Lil' Kim gets year for perjury.  // Daily Variety;7/7/2005, Vol. 288 Issue 3, p9 

    Reports that Kimberly Jones was sentenced to one year and one day for perjury and conspiracy when a confrontation happened between her entourage and the rival rap group Capone-N-Noreaga.

  • WHEN THE PUNISHMENT DOESN'T FIT THE CRIME. Luna, Erik // USA Today Magazine;Nov2003, Vol. 132 Issue 2702, p18 

    Explores the impact of the amendments to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines on the ability of courts to impose just and reasonable sentences. Similarities of the guidelines to the mandatory minimum terms; Delegation of lawmaking authority under the federal system; Impact of the Sentencing Reform...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics