TITLE

ESTIMATING THE IMPACT OF INCARCERATION ON SUBSEQUENT OFFENDING TRAJECTORIES: DETERRENT, CRIMINOGENIC, OR NULL EFFECT?

AUTHOR(S)
Bhati, Avinash Singh; Piquero, Alex R.
PUB. DATE
October 2007
SOURCE
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall2007, Vol. 98 Issue 1, p207
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Despite record levels of incarceration and much discussion about the role that incarceration plays in influencing criminal activity, there does not yet exist a sound knowledge base about the extent to which incarceration exhibits a criminogenic, deterrent, or null effect on subsequent individual offending trajectories. This is an unfortunate happenstance since classic criminological theories make vastly different predictions about the role of punishment in altering criminal activity, and life-course criminologists suggest that life events can materially influence subsequent criminal activity. Using arrest histories of a sample of prisoners released from state prisons in 1994 and followed for three years post-release, this Article seeks to address the impact of incarceration on subsequent offending trajectories. Results indicate that a comparison of the counter factual and actual offending patterns suggests that most releasees were either deterred from future offending (40%) or merely incapacitated by their incarceration (56%). Only about 4% had a criminogenic effect. Future theoretical and empirical research directions are outlined.
ACCESSION #
32432685

 

Related Articles

  • America: All locked up. Cannon, Carl M. // National Journal;8/15/98, Vol. 30 Issue 33, p1906 

    Criticizes the fairness of incarceration law in the United States. Positive effect of lengthy incarceration sentence on crime rates; Social implications of the national imprisonment policy; Evaluation on the effectiveness of increased incarceration punishment as a crime deterrent. INSETS:...

  • Assessing the Impact of First-Time Imprisonment on Offenders’ Subsequent Criminal Career Development: A Matched Samples Comparison. Nieuwbeerta, Paul; Nagin, Daniel; Blokland, Arjan // Journal of Quantitative Criminology;Sep2009, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p227 

    Using data from the Netherlands-based Criminal Career and Life-course Study the effect of first-time imprisonment between age 18–38 on the conviction rates in the 3 years immediately following the year of the imprisonment was examined. Unadjusted comparisons of those imprisoned and those...

  • Deterrence's difficulty. Katyal, Neal Kumar // Michigan Law Review;Aug97, Vol. 95 Issue 8, p2385 

    Focuses on the theory of deterrence in criminal law in the United States, which is the belief that increasing the penalty on a activity will mean that fewer people will perform it. Possible outcomes that arise from the criminalization of behavior; Reference to the idea of substitutes and...

  • Jail or ad, judge offers offenders.  // Editor & Publisher;9/4/93, Vol. 126 Issue 36, p25 

    Reports on the option given by Escambia County, Florida Judge William White to those convicted with minor crimes to either go to jail or buy advertisements that include their photographs and charges against them. Agreement of `Pensacola News Journal' publisher Denise Bannister with the...

  • Comments on Doug Husak: The Low Cost of Recognizing (and of Ignoring) the Limited Relevance of Intentions to Permissibility. Walen, Alec // Criminal Law & Philosophy;Jan2009, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p71 

    Doug Husak frames a worry that makes sense in the abstract, but in reality, there is not much to worry about. The thesis that intentions are irrelevant to permissibility (IIP) is a straw man. There are reasons to think that the moral significance of intentions is not properly registered in...

  • Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Understanding Disparate Results. Durlauf, Steven; Fu, Chao; Navarro, Salvador // Journal of Quantitative Criminology;Mar2013, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p103 

    Objectives: Investigate how different model assumptions have driven the conflicting findings in the literature on the deterrence effect of capital punishment. Methods: The deterrence effect of capital punishment is estimated across different models that reflect the following sources of model...

  • PUNISHMENT AND CRIME: AN EXAMINATION OF SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. Chiricos, Theodore G.; Waldo, Gordon P. // Social Problems;Fall70, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p200 

    Data from National Prisoner Statistics and Uniform Crime Reports are used to reexamine the relationship between rates of crime and the certainty and severity of punishment in the states of the United States. Recent research by Gibbs and Tittle using similar data to test deterrence hypotheses are...

  • THE EFFECT OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL SANCTIONS ON DELINQUENCY: A LONGITUDINAL COMPARISON OF LABELING AND DETERRENCE THEORIES. Thomas, Charles W.; Bishop, Donna M. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1984, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p1222 

    This article discusses research on a comparative assessment of selected hypotheses derived from labeling and deterrence theory that advance contradictory predictions regarding the influence of sanctions on the subsequent attitudes and behavior of those who are the object of sanctioning. Labeling...

  • CAVEAT.  // Reporter;Dec2003, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p16 

    The underlying law is the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. The Jacob Weiterung Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Program, found in §14071 of Title 42, U.S. Code, provides that a person who is convicted of a "criminal offense against a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics