TITLE

Bond v. United States

PUB. DATE
April 2000
SOURCE
Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents the United States Supreme Court case of Bond v. the US, which was decided in April of 2000. How the case was brought by Steven Dewayne Bond after he was arrested for trying to transport illegal drugs across the Texas border; Bond's argument that his bags were illegally searched by border police; Questions regarding a possible violation of Bond's Fourth Amendment rights; Outcome of the case.
ACCESSION #
3151755

 

Related Articles

  • Hands-Off Policy. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;Jun2000, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p36 

    Deals with the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court's position regarding privacy of bags that passengers carry with them from police and drug enforcement search in the Bond versus U.S. case. Comments from civil libertarians on the Supreme Court's decision; Coverage of the Supreme Court's privacy...

  • BOND v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Bond v. United States, case number 98-9349, argued on February 29, 2000 and decided on April 17, 2000. It is held in the decision that the physical manipulation of the carry-on bag of the petitioner by Border Patrol Agent Cantu violated...

  • Parental Notification Laws The Supreme Court Reenters the Abortion Debate.  // Supreme Court Debates;Jan2006, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1 

    The article presents a court case study related to abortion taken by the U.S. Supreme Court. The debate is the 2003 New Hampshire law requiring minors to notify a parent or guardian at least 48 hours prior to terminating a pregnancy. A Federal district court ruled that the absence of a health...

  • And May God Bless. Reske, Henry J. // ABA Journal;Feb92, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p46 

    Focuses on a lawsuit which deals with the standard for deciding whether government action runs afoul of the First Amendment ban on entangling church and state in the United States. Three factors which should be examined in deciding whether a law violates the First Amendment; Dissatisfaction...

  • IS THERE FREEDOM OF I.R.S. INFORMATION? Church of Scientology of California v. Internal Revenue.... Worthington, Jan // Tax Lawyer;Winter89, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p381 

    Focuses on the decision of the Supreme Court on the case of the Church of Scientology of California and Internal Revenue Service in the United States. Indications of the legislative history of the Tax Reform Act of 1976; Exemption of return information from disclosure under the Freedom of...

  • SUPREME COURT PREVIEW. Williams, Charles F.; Peck, Robert S. // ABA Journal;Feb92, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p38 

    Provides issues, facts, background and significance of several United States Supreme Court cases as of February 1992. 'United States vs. Williams'; 'National Railroad Passenger Corp. and Central Vermont Railway vs. Boston & Maine Corp.'

  • Good News from the Courts. Wilkie, Nancy C. // Archaeology;May/Jun2000, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p5 

    Focuses on the role played by the Archeological Institute of America in two legal actions involving protection of the world's heritage. Ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the cases involving the gold phiale which was purchased by Michael Steinhardt; Information on the case of the...

  • Dan Cohen v. Cowles Media Company, dba Minneapolis Star and Tribune Company, et al.  // Communications & the Law;Mar2000, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p57 

    Reports on the United States Supreme Court's ruling on the case of Dan Cohen versus Cowles Media Co. for breach of contract. Details on the court's ruling; Constitutional law regarding press protection.

  • High Court Lets Baldwin Ruling Stand. Bell, Allison // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;11/22/2010, Vol. 114 Issue 22, p9 

    The article reports on the refusal of U.S. Supreme Court to take the suit filed by Steve Baldwin and Pacific Justice Institute against Kathleen Sebelius and colleagues in opposition to the Affordable Care Act.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics