TITLE

The Judgment Fund: GAO-08-295R

PUB. DATE
February 2008
SOURCE
GAO Reports;2/27/2008, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Documents
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act of 2002 has, since October 1, 2003, required federal agencies to reimburse the Judgment Fund for payments made to claimants to cover judgments, awards, and settlements in equal employment opportunity (EEO) and whistleblower cases. As we previously reported in 2004, the reimbursement provision of the No FEAR Act was intended to make agencies more accountable for their violations of employment discrimination and whistleblower protection laws brought against the agencies. Similarly, the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA) also has, since March 1, 1979, required agencies to reimburse the Judgment Fund for payments to claimants in cases involving federal contract disputes. The No FEAR Act mandated that we conduct a study of the payments, reimbursements, and effects of the reimbursement provisions of both No FEAR Act and CDA cases. In 1956, Congress established the Judgment Fund, which is a permanent, indefinite appropriation to pay judgments against federal agencies that are not otherwise provided for by other appropriations. In 1961, legislation was enacted allowing the Judgment Fund to pay, among other things, Department of Justice (DOJ) settlements of ongoing or imminent lawsuits against federal agencies. The Judgment Fund is intended to allow for prompt payment of settlements and awards to claimants, thereby reducing the assessment of interest against federal agencies (where allowed by law) during the period between the rendering and payment of such settlements and awards. The Judgment Fund makes such payments upon certification that a court has handed down an award or that a settlement has been reached. The Judgment Fund is currently managed by the Department of the Treasury's Financial Management Service (FMS). In response to the mandate, the objectives of our review, for both No FEAR Act and CDA cases, were to: (1) determine in how many cases payments were made from the Judgment Fund for judgments, settlements, or awards resulting from (a) EEO and whistleblower protection complaints after the No FEAR Act became effective, and (b) contract disputes; (2) determine in how many cases and to what extent agencies made reimbursements to the Judgment Fund and how long reimbursements took; and (3) obtain agency official and stakeholder views of the effects of the requirement to reimburse the Judgment Fund on operations, appropriations, employee relations and other human capital matters, and settlement practices at federal agencies. From fiscal year 2004, when the No FEAR Act took effect, through fiscal year 2006, the Judgment Fund paid $45.1 million to claimants for settlements, awards, and other costs involving 625 No FEAR cases at 36 federal agencies. Of this amount, federal agencies had repaid $44.9 million, or 99 percent, as of March 31, 2007. These No FEAR agency reimbursements were made, on average, 4.8 months after the original Judgment Fund...
ACCESSION #
31129183

 

Related Articles

  • Developments in Industrial Relations.  // Monthly Labor Review;Dec77, Vol. 100 Issue 12, p71 

    Reports on news and developments concerning industrial relations in the U.S. as of December 1977. Layoffs at steel companies; Increase in salary of federal employees; Labor law violations charged against General Motors Corp.

  • Employment cost index--private industry.  // Economic Indicators;Aug96, p15 

    Presents statistics on the employment cost index for the private industry in the United States, for the period 1986 to June 1996.

  • Top elected officials.  // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);4/1/96, Vol. 43 Issue 14, p40 

    Ranks the top elected officials in the United States based on their salary. Includes Congressmen Gary Ackerman, Mike Forbes, Daniel Frisa, Peter King and Rick Liazo; Senators Alfonse D'Amato and Daniel Moynihan; Governor George Pataki.

  • Letter to Congressional leaders transmitting an alternative plan for federal civilian employee... Clinton, William J. // Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents;9/1/97, Vol. 33 Issue 35, p1269 

    Presents the United States President's letter to Congressional leaders transmitting an alternative plan for federal civilian employee pay adjustments. Pay increase for federal civilian employees; Considerations in evaluating economic conditions affecting the general welfare; Rulings on the pay...

  • Occupational Compensation Survey technical note.  // Compensation & Working Conditions;Fall97, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p100 

    Presents charts regarding average hourly and weekly earnings of selected occupations in the United States as of 1996.

  • News tidbits. Laabs, Jennifer J. // Personnel Journal;Jan95, Vol. 74 Issue 1, p11 

    Reports on the Federal Salary Council's call for a federal pay increase in the United States.

  • Official mileage rate jumps to 30 cents.  // Army Reserve Magazine;Summer95, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p31 

    Reports on the increase in the gas allowance of government employees in the United States.

  • Parasites. Jason, Gary // Liberty (08941408);Nov2010, Vol. 24 Issue 10, p19 

    The article argues that the U.S. federal employees' average compensation, including bonus, pension, and healthcare, of 123,000 U.S. dollars is now more than twice the average for workers in private industry at 61,000 U.S. dollars, according to the August 10, 2010 issue of "USA Today."

  • For regulators, inverted pay scales practically the rule. Fox, Justin // American Banker;10/30/1995, Vol. 160 Issue 209, p4 

    Focuses on the lesser salaries of top banking regulators in the United States compared to those of their subordinates. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.; Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; Office of Thrift Supervision.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics