TITLE

Miranda v. Dickerson

PUB. DATE
April 2000
SOURCE
Christian Science Monitor;4/19/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 103, p10
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Views the pros and cons if the Supreme court case Dickerson v. United States decides that police and courts should have more liberty to use criminal confessions.
ACCESSION #
3005384

 

Related Articles

  • Before the Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2000, Vol. 3 Issue 6, p186 

    Focuses on Charles Thomas Dickerson versus United States case. Arguments on behalf of Dickerson; Argument on behalf of the lower court decision on the case.

  • THE COURT SHOULD HAVE REMAINED SILENT: WHY THE COURT ERRED IN DECIDING DICKERSON V. UNITED STATES. Chemerinsky, Erwin // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Nov2000, Vol. 149 Issue 1, p287 

    Contends that the United States Supreme Court's decision in 'Dickerson v. United States' will be remembered for its emphatic reaffirmation of 'Miranda v. Arizona' case. Importance of the 'Dickerson' case for its importance in defining the relationship between the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court...

  • Should the Supreme Court Dump the Miranda Rules? Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;10/23/99, Vol. 31 Issue 43, p3031 

    Deals with the United States (US) issue on the Miranda rules or the rights of crime suspects which emanated from the decision in the 1966 Supreme Court case, Miranda versus Arizona. Evidence of the rules' popularity; Criticisms on the rules; Argument of Justice Byron R. White on the rules;...

  • RELIABILITY ASSESSMENTS AS A CONDITION FOR THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CONFESSIONS IN TENNESSEE. SELVA, LANCE H.; SHULMAN, WILLIAM L.; REID, STEPHEN // Law & Psychology Review;2015/2016, Vol. 40, p81 

    In this article, the authors discusses false confessions induced by police and the methods to address this issue in Tennessee. Topics discussed include the need to record police interrogations, the need for legislative reforms to implement laws related to this, and a research by Thomas Sullivan,...

  • IDENTIFYING AND (RE)FORMULATING PROPHYLACTIC RULES, SAFE HARBORS, AND INCIDENTAL RIGHTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Klein, Susan R. // Michigan Law Review;Mar2001, Vol. 99 Issue 5, p1030 

    Answers the conundrum of the Miranda versus Arizona case decision to justify other similar cases. Definition of the terms constitutional prophylactic rule, constitutional safe harbor rule and constitutional incidental right; Suggestion on the benefits of defining constitutional terms;...

  • Miranda Revisited. Petrowski, Thomas D. // FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin;Aug2001, Vol. 70 Issue 8, p25 

    Examined the decision of the United States Supreme Court on the case of Charles T. Dickerson for bank robbery. Evaluation of the admissibility of incriminating statements made by the accused; Discussion on voluntary confessions; Details of his case; Civil liability of federal lawsuits.

  • THE PATHS NOT TAKEN THE SUPREME COURT'S FAILURES IN DICKERSON. Cassell, Paul G. // Michigan Law Review;Mar2001, Vol. 99 Issue 5, p898 

    Argues on the decision of the Supreme Court on the Dickerson versus United States case. Description of a different path that the Court should have considered; How the Court's assertion of its power to promulgate the Miranda versus Arizona case conflicted with the decision in City of Boerne...

  • THE RISE AND FALL OF THE MIRANDA WARNINGS IN POPULAR CULTURE. STEINER, RONALD; BAUER, REBECCA; TALWAR, ROHIT // Cleveland State Law Review;2011, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p219 

    The article presents an insight about the fading prevalence of Miranda warnings on television and the impact of pop culture on these rights. It discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case of Dickerson v. United States, wherein the Court evaluates the ambiguity over whether Miranda portrays a...

  • Ultrasound guided continuous Quadratus Lumborum block hastened recovery in patients undergoing open liver resection: a randomized controlled, open-label trial. Zhu, Qiang; Li, Li; Yang, Zhaoyun; Shen, Jinmei; Zhu, Rong; Wen, Yu; Cai, Wenwu; Liu, Lei // BMC Anesthesiology;2/18/2019, Vol. 19 Issue 1, pN.PAG 

    Background: Quadratus lumborum (QL) block is increasingly being used as a new abdominal nerve block technique. In some studies of mid and lower abdominal and hip analgesia, continuous QL block achieved favorable outcomes as an alternative to continuous intravenous analgesia with opioids....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics