TITLE

Reading commission put on hold

PUB. DATE
February 2008
SOURCE
Reading Today;Feb/Mar2008, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the National Institute for Literacy's (NIFL) Commission of Reading Research (CRR) has been on hold by the U.S. Department of Education and other federal agencies. The duty of the CRR is to follow up the work of the National Reading Panel which has influenced on reading policy and practice. The commission has been included in the planning strategies since 2004 wherein the International Reading Association (IRA) has recommended several nominees for the commission.
ACCESSION #
30005478

 

Related Articles

  • Federal Official Says Reading Commission Will Move Forward. Manzo, Kathleen Kennedy // Education Week;2/6/2008, Vol. 27 Issue 22, p8 

    The article discusses a decision by the U.S. Department of Education to form a Commission on Reading Research. The idea for the commission came after a report was released by the U.S. National Reading Panel in which researchers found they wanted a means of addressing the need for educational...

  • Plans for Federal Reading Panel Hit a New Roadblock. Manzo, Kathleen Kennedy // Education Week;12/12/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 15, p1 

    The article focuses on a reading program called the Commission on Reading Research. The research program, which is a division of the National Institute for Literacy, will need approval from the U.S. Department of Education. The need for reading research is explored and the National Reading Panel...

  • Literacy Centers: A Way to Increase Reading Development. Burke, Lisa; Baillie, Sara // Academic Leadership (15337812);2011, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p1 

    The article focuses on the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001 from the U.S. Department of Education focused on improving the trends in education. According to the U.S. National Reading Panel good reader in elementary school develops more effective learner. It focused on the skills involved in the...

  • Research in Reading. Stinnett, Melissa // Illinois Reading Council Journal;Summer2009, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p63 

    The article discusses the results of several studies conducted in the U.S. regarding the impact of recreational reading on the children's reading ability. A study conducted by the National Reading Panel (NRP) has indicated no evidence of improvement of reading ability through reading practice....

  • But Does It Really Matter?  // Phi Delta Kappan;Feb2005, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p452 

    Presents a rebuttal to criticism of the author and the National Reading Panel's (NRP) "The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research." Claim that NRP's findings have been received positively according to how often it is cited; Criticism of Steven Krashen's article criticizing the NRP report;...

  • Ideology Is Still Trumping Evidence. Allington, Richard L. // Phi Delta Kappan;Feb2005, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p462 

    Need to base education on what works best for individual students and groups of students, not on what usually works best for the average student; Lack of an educational treatment that works effectively for all participants; Percentage of struggling readers who are left behind, as detailed in...

  • Murder Your Darlings: A Scientific Response to The Voice Of Evidence in Reading Research. Garan, Elaine M. // Phi Delta Kappan;Feb2005, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p438 

    Criticizes the Report of the National Reading Panel (NRP) and the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Claim that instead of an evidence-based guide to reading instruction, the NRP produced a report characterized by misreported, overgeneralized findings that mandate education policy in the name of...

  • Is In-School Free Reading Good for Children? Why the National Reading Panel Report Is (Still) Wrong. Krashen, Stephen // Phi Delta Kappan;Feb2005, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p444 

    Criticizes the National Reading Panel's report, "The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research," and Timothy Shanahan's response to previous criticism. Refutation of a claim made by Shanahan suggesting the author is against reading instruction due to his promotion of sustained silent reading; Effect...

  • Motivation and Commitment in the Interest of Science And Our Children. McCardle, Peggy; Chhabra, Vinita // Phi Delta Kappan;Feb2005, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p448 

    Presents a justification for the U.S. National Reading Panel's (NRP) report, "The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research," in light of criticism. Claim that the report was not motivated by resistance to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB); Focus of the criticism on sections written by Steven...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics