Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists -- a qualitative study

Berendsen, Annette J.; Benneker, Wim HGM.; Schuling, Jan; Rijkers-Koorn, Nienke; Slaets, Joris PJ.; Meyboom-de Jong, Betty
January 2006
BMC Health Services Research;2006, Vol. 6, p155
Academic Journal
Background: Collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists has been the focus of many collaborative care projects during the past decade. Unfortunately, quite a number of these projects failed. This raises the question of what motivates medical specialists to initiate and continue participating with GPs in new collaborative care models. The following question is addressed in this study: What motivates medical specialists to initiate and sustain new models for collaborating with GPs? Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with eighteen medical specialists in the province of Groningen, in the North of The Netherlands. The sampling criteria were age, gender, type of hospital in which they were practicing, and specialty. The interviews were recorded, fully transcribed, and analysed by three researchers working independently. The resulting motivational factors were grouped into categories. Results: 'Teaching GPs' and 'regulating patient flow' (referrals) appeared to dominate when the motivational factors were considered. In addition, specialists want to develop relationships with the GPs on a more personal level. Most specialists believe that there is not much they can learn from GPs. 'Lack of time', 'no financial compensation', and 'no support from colleagues' were considered to be the main concerns to establishing collaborative care practices. Additionally, projects were often experienced as too complex and time consuming whereas guidelines were experienced as too restrictive. Conclusion: Specialists are particularly interested in collaborating because the GP is the gatekeeper for access to secondary health care resources. Specialists feel that they are able to teach the GPs something, but they do not feel that they have anything to learn from the GPs. With respect to professional expertise, therefore, specialists do not consider GPs as equals. Once personal relationships with the GPs have been established, an informal network with incidental professional contact seems to be sufficient to satisfy the collaborative needs of the specialist. The concerns seem to outweigh any positive motivational forces to developing new models of collaborative practice


Related Articles

  • Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaboration models with medical specialists: a qualitative study. Berendsen, Annette J.; Benneker, Wim H.G.M.; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Klazinga, Niek S.; Schuling, Jan // BMC Health Services Research;2007, Vol. 7, p4 

    Background: Collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists has been the focus of many collaborative care projects during the past decade. Unfortunately, quite a number of these projects failed. This raises the question of what motivates GPs to initiate and continue...

  • Special interest GPs 'not cost-effective?'.  // Pulse;1/5/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p3 

    Details a study revealing that the Great Britain government's drive to increase the number of general practitioners with special interests may not be cost-effective. Shortcomings of the drive.

  • PCTs 'victimise' small practices.  // Pulse;11/15/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 45, p8 

    Focuses on a survey which states that small general practices in Great Britain were being victimized by prejudiced primary care trusts (PCTs) during quality visits. Discovery of the Small Practices Association (SPA) that a significant number of practices felt their PCT to be dismissive and...

  • Choose and Book scheme mandatory if you want to commission. Finch, Rob // Pulse;2/5/2005, Vol. 65 Issue 5, p2 

    Reports on the requirement for the general practitioners (GP) who take up practice-based commissioning to take on Choose and Book as well. Final guidance from the Department of Health on the requirement; Reaction of GP on the move; Position of health minister John Hutton on the intention to link...

  • The year is up, how has it been?  // Pulse;4/9/2005, Vol. 65 Issue 14, p16 

    Presents a question and answer advisory on how typical general practitioners (GP) deal with the demands of new contract for medical care. Quality achievements of GP; Mistake made of GP and actions to take for improvements; Goals and ambitions of GP over the years for general practices.

  • Why i love being a Norfolk GP. Forte, Vincent // Pulse;11/8/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 44, p76 

    Enumerates the reasons given by general practitioners as to why they love to practice in Norfolk, England. Opportunity to work in a speedboat; Comprehensibility of the local dialect; View of spectacular sunsets.

  • Why I support the Pulse Manifesto for General Practice.  // Pulse;4/9/2005, Vol. 65 Issue 14, p7 

    Presents several views from general practitioners (GP) on the reasons of supporting the "Pulse Manifesto," for general practice. Importance for financing health services; Reflections on the need of GP and patients for clinical freedom; Concern of GP on pensions finance.

  • An Assessment of Factors Influencing Physician Referral Behavior. McIlwain, Thomas F.; Hernandez, S. Robert // Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings;1989, p90 

    An assessment of the intentions of primary care physicians to refer patients to medical specialists was examined. The Fishbein Theory of Behavioral Intention provided the theoretical foundation for the analysis of structural relations using LISREL. Results identify numerous factors deemed...

  • GPs to screen under-35s for sudden cardiac death. Kelly, Brian // Pulse;3/22/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 12, p20 

    Focuses on the provision of a law submitted before the British Parliament which would require general practitioners (GP) to screen hundreds of thousands of patients under 35 for the risk of sudden cardiac death. Steps taken by the British Parliament to implement the substance of the bill;...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics