Do YOU have a right to "bear arms"?

Greenhouse, Linda; Liptak, Adam; Stout, David; Smith, Patricia
January 2008
New York Times Upfront;1/14/2008, Vol. 140 Issue 8, p14
The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff challenges the decision of a lower federal court in the District of Columbia against the plaintiff's petition to be allowed to bear arms, citing the Second Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court is set to finally interpret the law which was never directly interpreted in the past. According to the article, the decision of the Supreme Court will be deemed as the most significant ruling regarding the constitutionality of gun control.


Related Articles

  • Gay rights and gun rights. Carpenter, Dale // Bay Area Reporter;2/14/2008, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p14 

    The article focuses on a legal brief filed in the U.S. Supreme Court questioning the gun control in the District of Columbia (D.C.) in Washington, particularly for gays. The brief argues that the D.C. gun-control law violates the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Furthermore, the brief...

  • June Highlights. Schmertz Jr., John R.; Meier, Mike // International Law Update;Jun2004, Vol. 10, p81 

    This article presents information related to actions and defenses in the U.S. In class action suit by vitamin buyers against vitamin distributors, U.S. Supreme Court decides whether Sherman Act as amended by FTAIA reaches foreign antitrust activity occurring within and outside United States that...

  • Confidential evidence discounted in lawsuit. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;8/6/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 32, p3 

    This article reports on the decision of a three-judge panel of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss the suit against Baxter International, Inc. in the case Dennis Higginbotham et al. vs. Baxter International, Inc. The ruling was the fourth federal court decision since a June 21, 2007...

  • High court takes on class actions. GREENWALD, JUDY // Business Insurance;9/17/2012, Vol. 46 Issue 36, p03 

    The article reports that the eventual ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that deals with whether a putative class action suit should be heard in federal or state court could significantly impact business' success in defending class action suits. The underlying dispute concerns the...

  • Exceptional Deference to the States Requires Abstention. Levine, Caroline Johnson // Federal Lawyer;May/Jun2014, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p15 

    The article discusses U.S. Federal courts which may provide additional forums for litigants to pursue relief if dissatisfied with a state court proceeding. Topics discussed include federal courts must abstain from state court matters but in exceptional circumstances it may proceed, example of...

  • Supreme Court Adopts "Nerve Center" Test for Federal Diversity Jurisdiction. Bult, Teresa Rider // Litigation News;Summer2010, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p17 

    The article discusses the issue of determination of corporation's principal place of business for the purpose of federal diversity jurisdiction. The U.S. Supreme Court's adoption of "nerve center' test for determination is meeting with mixed reviews. The federal diversity jurisdiction statue...

  • Feds' $280B tobacco gambit up in smoke.  // Dow Theory Forecasts;10/24/2005, Vol. 61 Issue 43, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected a request by the Justice Department to review an appellate-court ruling that barred the government from seeking $280 billion in past tobacco profits. Tobacco companies have repeatedly denied allegations that they illegally misled the...

  • Post-Nicastro, Opposite Jurisdiction Outcomes for Foreign Defendant. Lacayo, Isabella C. // In-House Litigator;Winter2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p28 

    The article discusses court cases post-Nicastro that produce inconsistent results with regard to jurisdiction over the same foreign defendant, highlighting the need for the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt one of the Asahi tests. It cites the Supreme Court decision in the 2011 British J. McIntyre...

  • Battle over Breakaways.  // Time;1/26/1968, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p74 

    The article discusses a court case wherein two Southern Presbyterian congregations in Savannah, Georgia took legal action on keeping their property after breaking away from their parent church. The Presbyterian Church issued counterplea claiming that the abandonment of the church's original...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics