TITLE

Court rules in favor of Monolithic Power Systems in O2 Micro patent case

AUTHOR(S)
Taylor, Colleen
PUB. DATE
November 2007
SOURCE
Electronic News;11/12/2007, Vol. 53 Issue 46, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that Monolithic Power Systems Inc. announced that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a final judgment and rulings that all of the patent claims asserted by O2 Micro International Ltd. against MPS and MPS customer ASUSTeK Computer are invalid. The court's ruling affirms a jury verdict which found that none of the accused MPS CCFL inverter controllers literally infringes O2 Micro's patent No. 6,396,722.
ACCESSION #
27561226

 

Related Articles

  • Court rules in favor of Monolithic Power Systems in O2 Micro patent case. Taylor, Colleen // Electronic News;11/5/2007, Vol. 53 Issue 45, p28 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on the patent claims asserted by O2 Micro International Ltd. against Monolithic Power Systems Inc. (MPS) and ASUSTeK Computer. The court's ruling affirms a jury verdict, which found that none of...

  • Monolithic Does Not Infringe O2 Patent, Court Says.  // Electronic News;11/21/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 47, pN.PAG 

    The article reports on the judgment on the patent infringement case filed by O2 Micro International Ltd. against Monolithic Power Systems Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in November 2005. The court favors Monolithic. The judge awarded O2 Micro with U.S....

  • Jury rules in favor of Monolithic Power Systems in 02 Micro patent suit. Taylor, Colleen // Electronic News;5/21/2007, Vol. 53 Issue 21, p33 

    The article reports on the decision of a jury from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to rule in favor of fabless analog and mixed-signal semiconductor maker Monolithic Power Systems Inc. (MPS). According to MPS, the jury further found that none of the accused MPS...

  • Monolithic Does Not Infringe O2 Patent, Court Says.  // Electronic News;11/14/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 46, pN.PAG 

    This article reports on the ruling issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on a patent infringement suit filed by Los Gatos, California-based fabless analog/mixed-signal semiconductor supplier Monolithic Power Systems Inc. against O2 Micro International Ltd. in...

  • O2Micro Slaps Sony and Rohm with LCD Patent Suit.  // Electronic News;8/8/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 32, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the patent infringement lawsuit filed by O2Micro International Ltd. against Sony Corp. and Rohm Co. Ltd. in connection with sales and imports into the U.S. of Sony liquid crystal display television and other products based on Rohm integrated circuits. Basis of O2Micro on its...

  • Micrel, Monolithic Reach Settlement. Taylor, Colleen // Electronic News;9/25/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 39, p72 

    This article reports on a settlement between Micrel Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems Inc. regarding the patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation lawsuit filed by Micrel in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The patents and alleged trade secrets were...

  • O2MICRO POWER CONVERTER ISSUED U.S. PATENT.  // Electro Manufacturing;Mar2014, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p6 

    The article reports on the patent claims received by the Power Converter Controller invention of integrated circuit developer O2Micro International Ltd. in the U.S. where patented direct current (DC/DC) controller handles the output signal of the power converter.

  • Halo wins infringement cases.  // Cabinet Maker;4/23/2010, Issue 5684, p6 

    The article reports on the ruling which found that Foshan BOB Furniture Co. Ltd. and Foshan Zhongrui Furniture Co. have infringed the design patents made by Halo Asia Ltd. by manufacturing and selling similar items in Great Britain.

  • Damages double in Visto win against Seven. Gibbs, Colin // RCR Wireless News;12/25/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 52, p20 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on the patent-infringement case filed by Visto Corp. against Seven Networks Inc. The developer said it was awarded $7.7 million by the court in a final judgment of its case against Seven. The amount...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics