TITLE

Medicare Part D: CMS's Process and Policy for Enrolling New Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries: GAO-07-1022T

AUTHOR(S)
King, Kathleen M.
PUB. DATE
June 2007
SOURCE
GAO Reports;6/21/2007, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Document
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA), dual-eligible beneficiaries--individuals with both Medicare and Medicaid coverage--have their drug costs covered under Medicare Part D rather than under state Medicaid programs. The MMA requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to enroll these beneficiaries in a Medicare prescription drug plan (PDP) if they do not select a plan on their own. CMS enrolled about 5.5 million dual-eligible beneficiaries in late 2005 and about 634,000 who became dually eligible during 2006. GAO was asked to testify on (1) CMS's process for enrolling new dual-eligible beneficiaries into PDPs and its effect on access to drugs and (2) how CMS set the effective coverage date for certain dual-eligible beneficiaries and its implementation of this policy. This testimony is based on the GAO report, Medicare Part D: Challenges in Enrolling New Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries (GAO-07-272). CMS's process for enrolling new dual-eligible beneficiaries who have not yet signed up for a PDP involves many parties, information systems, and administrative steps, and takes a minimum of 5 weeks to complete. For about two-thirds of these individuals--generally Medicare beneficiaries who subsequently qualify for Medicaid--pharmacies may not have up-to-date PDP enrollment information needed to bill PDPs appropriately until the beneficiaries' data are completely processed. As a result, these beneficiaries may have difficulty obtaining their Part D-covered prescription drugs during this interval. CMS has created contingency measures to help individuals obtain their new Medicare benefit, but these measures have not always worked effectively. For the other one-third of new dual-eligible beneficiaries--Medicaid enrollees who become Medicare-eligible because of age or disability--CMS eliminated the impact of processing time by enrolling them in PDPs just prior to their attaining Medicare eligibility. This prospective enrollment, implemented in late 2006, offers these dual-eligible beneficiaries a seamless transition to Medicare Part D coverage. CMS set the effective Part D coverage date for Medicare eligible beneficiaries who subsequently become eligible for Medicaid to coincide with the date their Medicaid coverage becomes effective. Under this policy, which was designed to provide drug coverage for dual-eligible beneficiaries as soon as they attain dual-eligible status, the start of the Part D coverage can extend retroactively for several months before the date beneficiaries are notified of their PDP enrollment. GAO found that CMS did not fully implement or monitor the impact of this policy. Although beneficiaries are entitled to reimbursement for covered drug costs incurred during this retroactive period, CMS did not begin informing them of this right until March 2007. Given their vulnerability, it is unlikely that these beneficiaries would have sought reimbursement or retained...
ACCESSION #
25635390

 

Related Articles

  • How Much 'Skin In The Game' Do Medicare Beneficiaries Have? The Increasing Financial Burden Of Health Care Spending, 1997-2003. Neuman, Patricia; Cubanski, Juliette; Desmond, Katherine A.; Rice, Thomas H. // Health Affairs;Nov/Dec2007, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p1692 

    Rising health costs and an aging population present critical policy challenges. This paper examines the financial burden of out-of-pocket health spending among Medicare beneficiaries between 1997 and 2003. Over this period, median out-of-pocket spending as a share of income increased from 11.9...

  • Creating Accountable Care Organizations: The Extended Hospital Medical Staff. Fisher, Elliott S.; Staiger, Douglas O.; Bynum, Julie P. W.; Gottlieb, Daniel J. // Health Affairs;2007 Supplement, Vol. 26, pw44 

    Many current policies and approaches to performance measurement and payment reform focus on individual providers; they risk reinforcing the fragmented care and lack of coordination experienced by patients with serious illness. In this paper we show that Medicare beneficiaries receive most of...

  • Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiary Access to Physician Services: Trends in Utilization of Services, 2000 to 2002: GAO-05-145R. Steinwald, A. Bruce // GAO Reports;1/12/2005, p1 

    In the 1990s, several reforms to Medicare physician fees were implemented to help control spending growth in the traditional Medicare program, known as fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. Concerns were raised that these reforms might have a negative impact on Medicare beneficiaries' access to...

  • Study: patients with poor vision incur greater medical costs.  // Ophthalmology Times;3/15/2007, Vol. 32 Issue 6, p8 

    The article reports on the study that determines poor vision in patients may incur greater medical costs. In affiliation with the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, the Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and Pfizer Inc., the study shows that Medicare...

  • Rising Medicare Costs: Are We In Crisis? Goldman, Dana; Sood, Neeraj // Health Affairs;2006 Web Exclusives, Vol. 25, pw389 

    Kenneth Thorpe and David Howard provide an important snapshot of the long-term trends in Medicare beneficiaries' health care spending. They use clever methods to shed new light on increases in per capita spending, convincingly demonstrating that treatment patterns are a major factor. But several...

  • Why Did Medicare Spending Growth Slow Down? White, Chapin // Health Affairs;May/Jun2008, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p793 

    So-called excess growth in Medicare spending per beneficiary has varied widely and has slowed in recent years. The annual rate of excess growth fell from 5.6 percent during 1975-1983, to 2.1 percent during 1983-1997, to only 0.5 percent during 1997-2005. Changes in payment policies and...

  • Distribution of Medicare Cost-Sharing Liability.  // Health Care Financing Review;Summer94 Supplement, Vol. 15, p44 

    The article provides information on the distribution of Medicare cost-sharing liability among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. In 1992, an estimated 27.9 million Medicare beneficiaries used covered services and incurred cost-sharing liability amounting to $21.7 billion, an average...

  • Issues in National Health Insurance. Donabedian, Avedis // American Journal of Public Health;Apr1976, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p345 

    Health insurance, by reducing net price to the consumer and increasing the opportunities for revenue to the provider, has profound effects, among other things, on the volume, content and distribution of services, their prices, and the capacity of providers to produce them. The magnitude and...

  • The impact of Part D on manufacturers. Lipowski, Earlene // Drug Topics;1/8/2007, Vol. 151 Issue 1, p30 

    The article discusses the benefits and impacts of Medicare Part D plan on Medicare beneficiaries and pharmaceutical manufacturers in the U.S. It mentioned that the benefit is seen to increase access to medication among, the government programs runs, risk of concentrating purchase power by...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics