TITLE

Disgruntled with Part D? Here's how to appeal

PUB. DATE
April 2007
SOURCE
Drug Topics;4/2/2007, Vol. 151 Issue 7, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information on how to appeal for the health insurance plan of Medicare Part D patients. Patients who experienced problem with plans that do not pay for the drug that they need may have a detailed procedure on how to appeal the decision through the March 23 "Federal Register" posted in the web site http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-5304.htm. They can seek for a reconsideration by their plans, an independent review group, an administrative law judge, and by the Medicare Appeals Council (MAC). If the steps provided in the web site fail to fulfill the needs of the patient, they may have the opportunity to file for a civil action in the federal district court.
ACCESSION #
25083080

 

Related Articles

  • Groups Propose Part D Message Tweaks.  // Health Data Management;Jun2006, Vol. 14 Issue 6, p20 

    The article offers information on the use of standard codes in electronic messages to notify pharmacists of rejected claims as agreed by Medicare Part D drug benefit companies and pharmacies. The standard processes for notification of denied claims was developed by America's Health Insurance...

  • Updating the health care coding system.  // AHA News;10/18/2004, Vol. 40 Issue 21, p6 

    Reports on the plan of the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to update the coding system used to identify and pay for health care items and services as of October 2004. Time frame for the project; Duties of the CMS Council on Technology and Innovation.

  • "Medically Unbelievable Edits" to be Implemented by CMS on July 5, 2005. Barnes, Krista // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on Medically Unbelievable Edits, a system that will automatically deny Medicare claims for services which exceed a specified number of service units per day, created by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The system will examine such claims for the same...

  • Medicare Needs to Address Multiple Chronic Conditions.  // O&P Business News;9/1/2005, Vol. 14 Issue 17, p64 

    The article focuses on the need for the Medicare program in the U.S. to address multiple chronic conditions. The proposal is based on the observation that 83 percent of Medicare beneficiaries have at least one chronic condition, such as congestive hart failure and Alzheimer's disease. According...

  • How I got Medicare to apologize. Fuesler, Donald A. // Medical Economics;2/12/96, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p212 

    The article presents the author's account to refund an overpayment made by Medicare. In October 1994, he received Correspondence from Aetna Life Insurance Co., the local Medicare carrier. The letter informed him that he had been overpaid $111.45 by Medicare and that he must repay the money...

  • How Would Your Practice Handle This Scenario Involving a Free Med Sample?  // Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement;1/27/2011, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p5 

    The article provides an answer to a question on what should a practice physician consider when providing free samples of medication and billing an office visit procedure in the U.S.

  • Part B Questions & Answers.  // Eli's Rehab Report;Feb2012, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p15 

    The article provides an answer to a question of billing negative pressure wound therapy under the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code of "97605" and the reimbursement of the procedure.

  • Liability Claims in the Medicare Secondary Payer Arena: Planning the Medicare Set-Aside. Joyner, Charles D.; Harper, Christine E. // FDCC Quarterly;Spring2011, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p288 

    The article presents three ways to protect the interest of Medicare and enforce the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (MSPA), which include conditional payments, Medicare set-aside, and the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA). It says that Medicare has a statutory right of...

  • MEDICARE PART D LOW-INCOME SUBSIDY: Assets and Income Are Both Important in Subsidy Denials, and Access to State and Manufacturer Drug Programs Is Uneven. A. Bruce Steinwald // GAO Reports;9/5/2008, p1 

    The article presents a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding the utilization of and access to Part D prescription drugs by Medicare beneficiaries. The report focuses on the assets and income in low-income subsidy denials from 2006-2007 and programs that provide...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics