TITLE

Gun control overview

PUB. DATE
November 1999
SOURCE
Congressional Digest;Nov99, Vol. 78 Issue 11, p258
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents an overview on gun control laws and controversies in the United States. Views of proponents and opponents of the gun control legislation; Regulation of firearms sale and ownership by the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968; Changes in the Gun Control Act of 1968.
ACCESSION #
2488538

 

Related Articles

  • Gun Control: The Time Is Now. Curtin Jr., John J. // ABA Journal;Jul91, Vol. 77 Issue 7, p8 

    Comments on two proposed gun control laws in the United States. Required waiting period before the purchase of a gun under the Brady bill; Control on the availability of military assault weapons under the second bill; American Bar Association's support of the legislation.

  • Jumping the Gun. Henricks, Mark // Entrepreneur;May2005, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p30 

    Reports on the issues concerning the recently passed firearm law which allows employees to keep firearms in cars parked on company property in Oklahoma. Assertion on the rights of employers to prohibit guns in the workplace; Appeals of gun-rights advocates; Questions on the constitutionality of...

  • THE EDUCATION OF JOE MANCHIN. WALSH, JOAN // Progressive Populist;5/15/2013, Vol. 19 Issue 9, p13 

    The article features Senator Joe Manchin from West Virginia and examines the issue surrounding his gun control legislation. It states that such legislation would expand background checks and would address gun-show loopholes. It also reports on the allegations made by Manchin that the National...

  • Handgun Acquisitions in California After Two Mass Shootings. Studdert, David M.; Yifan Zhang; Rodden, Jonathan A.; Hyndman, Rob J.; Wintemute, Garen J. // Annals of Internal Medicine;5/16/2017, Vol. 166 Issue 10, p698 

    Background: Mass shootings are common in the United States. They are the most visible form of firearm violence. Their effect on personal decisions to purchase firearms is not well-understood. Objective: To determine changes in handgun acquisition patterns after the mass shootings in Newtown,...

  • mark thomas. Thomas, Mark // New Statesman;12/6/2004, Vol. 133 Issue 4717, p23 

    Comments on the use and sale of electro-shock batons in Britain. Amnesty International's documentation of the injury and distress caused by the use of Tasers; Focus of the 2002 Export Control Bill on banning trade in these illegal goods; Website of TLT International, a U.K. company, which...

  • Power Down: Tasers, The Fourth Amendment, and Police Accountability in the Fourth Circuit. MANCE, IAN A. // North Carolina Law Review;2013, Vol. 91 Issue 2, p606 

    The article discusses police accountability and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in relation to police officers and their use of non-lethal weapons such as tasers as of January 2013, focusing on several legal cases which were filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth...

  • PARING DOWN THE ARSENAL. von Hippel, Frank // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;May/Jun1997, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p33 

    Discusses President Clinton and President Boris Yeltsin negotiation on the third Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START III). Aim of START III; Global ban on the production of fissile material for warheads; United States breakout advantage. INSETS: De-alerting.;The Deep Cuts Study Group..

  • Portrait of a bad idea. Lewis, George; Postol, Theodore // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jul/Aug1997, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p18 

    Reports that United States ballistic-missile defense program undercut the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty. Information about the deals of United States and Russia regarding the ABM treaty; Russian dilemma on United States missile defense efforts; Provisions of ABM Treaty on signatories.

  • Cuba case tests treaty. Wright, Susan // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Nov/Dec1997, Vol. 53 Issue 6, p18 

    Reports the violations of Article V of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention committed by the United States on the Cuban territory on October 1996. Debate on preventive measures against the noncomplacency of countries; Issues discussed at the 1991 Third Review Conference of non-aligned...

  • A bad chemical arms pact. Kyl, Jon // Christian Science Monitor;3/18/97, Vol. 89 Issue 77, p19 

    Opinion. Asserts that the United States has much more to lose in embracing the Chemical Weapons Convention chemical arms treaty than in rejecting it. Reasons behind this contention; Hazards of ratifying such a treaty to the United States; Persons who oppose the treaty.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics