Major Systems Acquisitions

Lawson, Marci A.
January 2007
Army Lawyer;Jan2007, Issue 404, p133
Trade Publication
The article discusses the report issued by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding the failure of the country's Department of Defense to obtain sufficient data rights for the major systems acquisitions of weapons. The said report has been based on the objective of GAO which is to assess the effects of the technical data rights towards the sustainment plans of the Army and Air Force for fielded weapon systems.


Related Articles

  • Choose Your Weapons, Gentlemen. Burnham, James // National Review;10/15/1976, Vol. 28 Issue 39, p1110 

    The article comments on the U.S. Department of Defense's description of the advantages of their weapons systems. The factors considered when making decisions about major weapons are enumerated. The idea that the Right more or less automatically objects to any proposal to reduce the agency's...

  • Defense Acquisitions: DOD's Revised Policy Emphasizes Best Practices, but More Controls Are Needed: GAO-04-53.  // GAO Reports;11/10/2003, p1 

    The Department of Defense's (DOD) investment in new weapon systems is expected to exceed $1 trillion from fiscal years 2003 to 2009. To reduce the risk of cost and schedule overruns, DOD revamped its acquisition policy in May 2003. The policy provides detailed guidance on how weapon systems...

  • Defense Acquisitions: GAO-08-674T.  // GAO Reports;4/29/2008, p1 

    DOD's investment in weapon systems represents one of the largest discretionary items in the budget. The department expects to invest about $900 billion (fiscal year 2008 dollars) over the next 5 years on development and procurement with more than $335 billion invested specifically in major...

  • The DOD Acquisition/Test Process: What Went Wrong and How to Fix the Process. Adolph, Pete // ITEA Journal of Test & Evaluation;Mar2010, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p49 

    This article summarizes the changes to the acquisition/test processes since the mid-1990s and the impact of those changes. The way to judge the effectiveness of any set of initiatives is to assess outcomes. The changes of the last 15 years, in the aggregate, have had a significant negative...

  • Rifle Jam. Hockmuth, Catherine MacRae // Aviation Week & Space Technology;11/13/2006, Vol. 165 Issue 19, p131 

    The article reports on the claim by the U.S. Department of Defense's inspector general that the U.S. Army's Individual Combat Weapon (OICW) program has internal control problems and that officials moved forward with milestone decisions before obtaining warfighter requirements from the...

  • Defense Management: DOD Needs to Demonstrate That Performance-Based Logistics Contracts Are Achieving Expected Benefits: GAO-05-96.  // GAO Reports;9/9/2005, p1 

    The Department of Defense (DOD) contracts with private sector companies to perform depot maintenance of weapon systems using performance-based logistics--that is, purchasing a defined level of performance over a defined time period at a fixed cost to the government. After implementing such...

  • Spectrum Management in Defense Acquisitions: GAO-03-617R.  // GAO Reports;4/30/2003, p1 

    The electromagnetic radio frequency spectrum is critical to the development and operation of a variety of military systems such as radios, radars, and satellites. Due to the changing nature of warfighting, more and more military systems depend on the spectrum to guide precision weapons and...

  • Pentagon moves forward on ACTDs. Morrocco, John D. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;7/4/1994, Vol. 141 Issue 1, p70 

    Reports on the plan of Pentagon to approve management plans to implement six Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) programs. Incorporation of all essential details for the ACTD; Memorandums of agreement between the users and developers; Evaluation of weapon systems developed from new...

  • Improving Materiel Readiness for the joint Warfighter. McCoy, Eric // Army Logistician;Jan2009, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p40 

    The article examines the need of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) to adopt life-cycle systems in the management of its weapon systems. The program management should focus on the expansion of the fleet management and linking of acquisition and sustainment communities. It highlights the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics