TITLE

Should the Supreme Court Dump the Miranda Rules?

AUTHOR(S)
Taylor Jr., Stuart
PUB. DATE
October 1999
SOURCE
National Journal;10/23/99, Vol. 31 Issue 43, p3031
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Deals with the United States (US) issue on the Miranda rules or the rights of crime suspects which emanated from the decision in the 1966 Supreme Court case, Miranda versus Arizona. Evidence of the rules' popularity; Criticisms on the rules; Argument of Justice Byron R. White on the rules; Decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Charles T. Dickerson versus United States.
ACCESSION #
2471353

 

Related Articles

  • IDENTIFYING AND (RE)FORMULATING PROPHYLACTIC RULES, SAFE HARBORS, AND INCIDENTAL RIGHTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Klein, Susan R. // Michigan Law Review;Mar2001, Vol. 99 Issue 5, p1030 

    Answers the conundrum of the Miranda versus Arizona case decision to justify other similar cases. Definition of the terms constitutional prophylactic rule, constitutional safe harbor rule and constitutional incidental right; Suggestion on the benefits of defining constitutional terms;...

  • THE PATHS NOT TAKEN THE SUPREME COURT'S FAILURES IN DICKERSON. Cassell, Paul G. // Michigan Law Review;Mar2001, Vol. 99 Issue 5, p898 

    Argues on the decision of the Supreme Court on the Dickerson versus United States case. Description of a different path that the Court should have considered; How the Court's assertion of its power to promulgate the Miranda versus Arizona case conflicted with the decision in City of Boerne...

  • Define 'voluntary'. Coulter, Ann // Human Events;03/05/99, Vol. 55 Issue 9, p6 

    Reports on efforts to overturn Miranda v. Arizona, a United States Supreme Court ruling on the admissibility in evidence of a criminal confession. 1968 Omnibus Crime Control Act's repeal of the Miranda ruling; United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in US v. Dickerson; Number of...

  • THE PUBLIC SAFETY EXCEPTION TO MIRANDA AND THE \VAR ON TERROR: DESPERATE TIMES Do NOT ALWAYS CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES. Hartmann, David T. // George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal;Spring2012, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p219 

    The article focuses on the Miranda Rights of the U.S., which is an exception to public safety, and discusses the war on terror led by the U.S. President Barack Obama. It provides information on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in two cases Miranda v. Arizona and Dickerson v. United States. The...

  • VIVA MIRANDA: New Jersey invigorates doctrine. Reidinger, Paul // ABA Journal;Oct86, Vol. 72 Issue 10, p88 

    Focuses on Supreme Court of New Jersey's protection of rights of criminal defendants. Goal of satisfying requirements of U.S. Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona; U.S. Supreme Court's decision to limit the scope of defendants' rights under the federal Constitution.

  • A Gifted Gadfly.  // Time;11/11/1966, Vol. 88 Issue 20, p89 

    The article features Yale Kamisar, a Michigan law professor who wrote the article "Equal Justice in the Gatehouses and Mansions of American Criminal Procedure," which footnotes the Miranda v. Arizona case. It mentions that Kamisar is considered as the most overpowering and visible criminal-law...

  • Before the Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2000, Vol. 3 Issue 6, p186 

    Focuses on Charles Thomas Dickerson versus United States case. Arguments on behalf of Dickerson; Argument on behalf of the lower court decision on the case.

  • Miranda v Arizona.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Miranda v. Arizona argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Closing comments by judges.

  • MAIMONIDES, MIRANDA, AND THE CONUNDRUM OF CONFESSION: SELF-INCRIMINATION IN JEWISH AND AMERICAN LEGAL TRADITIONS. ABRAMS GREENWALD, BECKY // New York University Law Review;Nov2014, Vol. 89 Issue 5, p1743 

    This Note argues that both Jewish and American law express skepticism about self-incriminating statements based on concerns of reliability, respect for the individual, and the religious belief that confessions can be offered only to God. However, both traditions also recognize that certain...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics