TITLE

Nuclear Nonproliferation: DOE's International Radiological Threat Reduction Program Needs to Focus Future Efforts on Securing the Highest Priority Radiological Sources: GAO-07-282

AUTHOR(S)
Aloise, Gene
PUB. DATE
March 2007
SOURCE
GAO Reports;3/13/2007, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Document
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, U.S. and international experts raised concerns that unsecured radiological sources were vulnerable to theft and posed a significant security threat to the United States and the international community. Radioactive material is encapsulated or sealed in metal to prevent its dispersal and is commonly called a sealed radiological source. Sealed radiological sources are used worldwide for many legitimate purposes, such as medical, industrial, and agricultural applications. However, the total number of these sources in use worldwide is unknown because many countries do not systematically account for them. It is estimated that thousands of these sources have been lost, stolen, or abandoned--commonly referred to as orphan sources. If certain types of these sources were obtained by terrorists, they could be used to produce a simple and crude, but potentially dangerous, weapon--known as a radiological dispersion device, or dirty bomb. In 2001, a congressional report directed DOE to use a portion of its fiscal year 2002 supplemental appropriation to address the threat posed by dirty bombs. In response to the congressional requirement, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) established the Radiological Threat Reduction Task Force to identify, recover, and secure vulnerable, high-risk radiological sources, budgeting $20.6 million for the program in fiscal year 2002. The program initially focused on securing sources in the countries of the former Soviet Union (FSU) because DOE officials determined this region had the greatest number of vulnerable sources. In 2003, at the direction of the Secretary of Energy, DOE expanded the scope of the program to secure sealed sources worldwide, ultimately establishing the International Radiological Threat Reduction (IRTR) Program. The program's primary objective is to protect U.S. national security interests by (1) implementing rapid physical security upgrades at vulnerable sites containing radioactive sources; (2) locating, recovering, and consolidating lost or abandoned high-risk radioactive sources; and (3) supporting the development of the infrastructure necessary to sustain security enhancements and supporting regulatory controls, including the development of regional partnerships to leverage international resources. In addition, DOE has established a program to recover sealed sources produced and distributed in the United States, known as the U.S. Radiological Threat Reduction program. Part of this program's mission is to recover U.S.-origin sources on a case-by-case basis that were supplied by DOE to other countries under the Atoms for Peace program. The IRTR program is administered by NNSA with support from multiple national laboratories. The national laboratories' responsibilities include (1) assessing the physical security requirements of countries participating in the program, (2) recommending specific upgrades to strengthen...
ACCESSION #
24583838

 

Related Articles

  • The Soviet Amendments and Mr. Gromyko's Speech.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar1947, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p69 

    The author reflects on the amendments of the Soviet Union towards the control plan proposed by the United States. Mr. Gromyko declares that the American control plan is unacceptable and he submitted 12 amendments to the plan. The Soviet Union agreed to the international control of both military...

  • The challenge of nuclear safeguards. Fischer, David A.V. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jun/Jul1986, Vol. 42 Issue 6, p29 

    Discusses the success of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards and its contribution to the security of all nations. Example for arms control; Structure, goal and authority of the IAEA; Technical progress; Political and technical challenges facing IAEA; Important factors that must...

  • New Zealand's antinuclear stand. Clements, Kevin P. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar1987, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p32 

    Explains the antinuclear stand of New Zealand. Ban on nuclear-propelled and nuclear-armed warships from New Zealand's ports; Search by New Zealand and other South Pacific nations for ways to insure national and regional denuclearization as a contribution to global security; Significance of...

  • Minimum deterrence, mutual security. Vayrynen, Raimo // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar1987, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p45 

    Explores how the Reykjavik, Iceland summit on nuclear arms might contribute to an international policy of minimum deterrence and mutual security. Reasons why the summit threatened to produce the wrong results; Agreement of summit participants to reduce nuclear arsenal by 50 percent;...

  • Priorities for Technology Development and Policy to Reduce the Risk from Radioactive Materials. Duggan, Ruth // Proceedings of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management Ann;2010, p1 

    The Standing Committee on International Security of Radioactive and Nuclear Materials in the Nonproliferation and Arms Control Division conducted its fourth annual workshop in February 2010 on Reducing the Risk from Radioactive and Nuclear Materials. This workshop examined new technologies in...

  • ATOMS FOR PEACE.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;May1957, Vol. 13 Issue 5, p181 

    The article offers news briefs related to the nuclear nonproliferation campaign of the U.S. On March 22, 1957, President Dwight Eisenhower urged the Senate to ratify without delay the charter of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Furthermore, agreements signed with Ecuador, Iran, and...

  • FOREWARNED-BUT NOT FOREARMED. Rabinawitch, Eugene // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Oct1949, Vol. 5 Issue 10, p273 

    The article discusses the developments of atomic explosion in the Soviet Union. This development signifies that the Soviet scientists and engineers have been able to produce more than critical amounts of fissionable substances. It was believed that the Soviet production of atomic bombs does not...

  • Whither the treaty? Barkenbus, Jack N. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1980, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p37 

    The article focuses on the concern of U.S. President Jimmy Carter over the misuse of materials and facilities intended for peaceful nuclear energy operations for military purposes. The U.S. President seeks to postpone the international trade in nuclear fissile material till a more stringent...

  • The Road to Recovery. Saunders, Paul J. // National Interest;Jan/Feb2008, Issue 93, p4 

    The article presents the author's views, from a realist perspective on international relations, as to how to advance the most important U.S. foreign policy goals: preventing terrorism and nuclear proliferation. International cooperation and the rebuilding of bilateral and multilateral...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics