TITLE

Testing Nuclear Weapons: The French Decision

AUTHOR(S)
Forge, John; Myhra, Sverre
PUB. DATE
January 1996
SOURCE
Social Alternatives;Jan96, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p42
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the official reasons behind the decision by France to undertake a series of nuclear tests at Mururoa Atoll. To see if it works at all, to see how well it works and to see whether the test confirms the underlying scientific theory are the three reasons behind a nuclear test. Taking the reliability of the French arsenal and the affirmation of the French deterrent as reasons to test is difficult to reconcile. Although France has denied that it is developing new warheads, in the context of the present tests, it is significant that the official statements imply an intention to continue development of new warheads.
ACCESSION #
24229807

 

Related Articles

  • Test Ban: Strikeout. Fozzy, Paula // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Oct1961, Vol. 17 Issue 8, p348 

    The article offers information on the announcement made by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on August 31, 1961 that it was resuming nuclear testing because of the pressure from imperialist countries. The resumption statement of the Soviet Union has charged bad faith and deception on the...

  • After nuclear tests, it's hotter in paradise. Barr, Cameron W. // Christian Science Monitor;6/12/98, Vol. 90 Issue 138, p1 

    Focuses on the environmental and political effects of nuclear weapons testing in South Asia. Lingering hostilities between Pakistan and India that have prompted the tests; Aesthetic beauty of Kashmir, India; The 50 year-old territorial dispute; Warnings of Ahmed Shah Geelani, an Islamic...

  • Detection and Identification of Underground Nuclear Explosions. Brown, Harold // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar1960, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p89 

    The article discusses the current status of the seismic techniques for detecting and identifying nuclear explosions. According to the author, in the present state of knowledge there seems to be no way of saying definitely from seismic considerations alone that an event is an explosion. It does...

  • Prepared by PETER AXEL.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Feb1951, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p62 

    The article offers various news about nuclear weapons testing and nuclear energy production in the United States. Part of the air-force bombing range near Las Vegas, Nevada has been opened to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission for atomic weapons testing. The construction of new uranium production...

  • WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Nov1954, Vol. 10 Issue 9, p365 

    The article offers news briefs related to development of weapons. In Soviet Union, it was reported that another atomic weapon had been exploded to study battle effects with results valuable for solving problems of atomic defense. According to Atomic Energy Commission, new atomic tests In Nevada...

  • Nuke Experiment 'Downhole'. Scott, William B. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;5/31/2004, Vol. 160 Issue 22, p71 

    Sometime in the next few weeks, powerful X-ray beams fired through the heart of a high-explosive detonation will provide valuable information about how plutonium acts during a nuclear implosion. Conducted in a maze of tunnels 1,000 ft. underground here, the latest "subcritical" experiment will...

  • Expert Panel Says RRW Needs More Tests, Peer Review. Lobsenz, George // Defense Daily;10/2/2007, Vol. 236 Issue 2, p2 

    The article discusses the findings of the JASON Defense Advisory Panel, an independent group of nuclear weapons scientists about the Energy Department's proposal of a reliable replacement warhead known as the RRW. It states that the Energy Department must conduct more experiments and research...

  • Why not stop testing? Hopkins, John C. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1977, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p30 

    The author presents the reasons why nuclear weapons testing should continue. According to the author, who happens to be a nuclear weapon designer, if they stop weapon testing then they would not get the new weapons systems which is their primary responsibility. He also asserted that if weapon...

  • Should We Resume Nuclear Weapons Tests? Humphrey, Hubert H. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar1960, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p85 

    The article inquires if U.S. will resume the nuclear weapons testing. According to the author, the U.S. should not continue nuclear weapons tests for the next six months in order to have ample time for the exhaustion of every means for reaching a workable, controlled test ban agreement at the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics