District Court Lacks Jurisdiction To Enforce Preliminary Orders of Reinstatement In Sarbanes-Oxley Cases

Cino, Richard J.
October 2006
Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q4, p1
The article focuses on the ruling of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia on a petition to enforce a preliminary order of reinstatement under the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act. Details of the case involving a complainant who filed a lawsuit for alleged violation of the SOX Act are discussed, as well as the significance of the decision of the court for employers.


Related Articles

  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistle-Blower Protection Does Not Cover Media Leaks. Learman, Zack // HR Magazine;Jul2011, Vol. 56 Issue 7, p56 

    The article discusses the court case in which the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the firm, Boeing, did not breach the whistle-blower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) when it dismissed two staff who exposed internal company information to the media. In the case Tides versus...

  • Letter from the Editor. Gingerich, Elizabeth // Journal of Values Based Leadership;Winter/Spring2011, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p6 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including one related to the passage of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the other on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and the third on the myriad lawsuits filed by the U.S. government .

  • Administrative Judge Dismisses Sarbanes-Oxley Complaint of Employee Previously Reinstated Under Preliminary DOL Order. Cino, Richard J. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on the decision of a federal district court to dismiss Sarbanes-Oxley ACT (SOX) complaint of an employee that was previously reinstated under the preliminary order of the U.S. Department of Labor. The background of the Bechtel v. Competitive Technologies Inc. is provided. The...

  • Second Circuit Holds that SOX Whistleblower Claims May Be Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q4, Special section p1 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff alleged that her former employer violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), which prohibits public companies from discharging an employee because he or she provided information or assistance to a person with authority regarding any conduct...

  • SOX Whistleblower Protections Don't Apply to Media Leaks. TRENT, ASHLEY // InsideCounsel;Jul2011, Vol. 22 Issue 235, p67 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the 9th Circuit Court upheld the decision of the district court in awarding summary judgment in the case of Tides v. The Boeing Co. It involved internal auditors, Nicholas Tides and Matthew Neumann who sued Boeing after they were fired for violating the...

  • NOTE: Unfettered Clawbacks-Why Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Requires a Personal Misconduct Standard. Kimes, Isaac U. // University of Memphis Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p797 

    The article focuses on the section 304 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act that acts as a remedy for misconduct dealing with the financial reports. It discusses the Arizona District Court's decision in SEC v. Jenkins, which states the clawbacks from chief executive officers (CEOs) who are not a part...

  • Supreme Court Ruling on the PCAOB. Daniel, Lara // CPA Journal;Aug2010, Vol. 80 Issue 8, p14 

    The article discusses the lawsuit filed by the Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts LLP against the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia over the constitutionality of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The plaintiffs said the creation...

  • MERCK & CO. V. REYNOLDS: SARBANES-OXLEY'S PERPLEXING STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.  // Loyola Law Review;Spring2011, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p1133 

    The article offers information about the U.S. Supreme Court case Merck & Co. v. Reynolds which related to securities. It provides details of the case and analyzes the statute of limitations in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Court's interpretation about an inquiry notice of a plaintiff, and the...

  • SOX Applied to Employee Working Overseas. Lewis, Jackson // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff, a former employee working in France, filed a whistleblowing claim against the Bermuda parent company Accenture Ltd. and its U.S. subsidiary Accenture LLP. According to the defendants, the whistleblower protection provisions of the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics