Hotel Owners Can Avoid Property Tax Surprises

Dowell, Bernice
January 2007
National Real Estate Investor;Jan2007, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p60
Trade Publication
The article offers due-diligence steps for hotel buyers to avoid property tax surprises. One of the steps is to utilize proper methodology in estimating future proper taxes accurately through reasonable income and expenses estimates. Another step is the proper recording of transactions in the land records when closing the records. Lastly is to keep records of closing documents to support the buyer with his transfer tax return and to represent the price of the real estate against revaluation.


Related Articles

  • After Proposition 13--the Deluge? Break, George F. // Challenge (05775132);Jan/Feb79, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p54 

    The California voter tidal wave which made Proposition 13 the by word of the year could prove to be one of the most counterproductive anti-tax moves on record. A poorly written initiative, as even many proponents acknowledged, its purpose was to cut the Mighty Menace of the mushrooming property...

  • Hotel owners shouldn't pay real-estate taxes on business value. Belfrage, Eric // Hotel & Motel Management;3/4/2002, Vol. 217 Issue 4, p10 

    Comments on the real-estate tax payments of hotel owners. Classification of hotels under the property-taxing jurisdictions; Exemption for the taxation of intangible assets; Impact of appropriate allocation of non-real estate items to tax savings.

  • ON THE MEASUREMENT OF ASSESSMENT ERROR. Romans, J.T. // National Tax Journal;Mar70, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p89 

    Discusses the measurement of errors in tax assessments for the same property. Accuracy of measurement; Comparison with assessment error for different classes of property; Indicators of assessment bias or error.

  • The Appraisal Docket. Theiss, William R. // Appraisal Journal;Oct68, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p613 

    Presents a case that centered on determining true cash value for real estate tax assessment. Real estate tax assessment of the Fisher-New Center Complex in Detroit, Michigan; Michigan Supreme Court's ruling that administrative decisions on tax matters are reviewed only on certain grounds;...

  • Cases in brief.  // Appraisal Journal;Jul98, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p326 

    Asserts that specific attributes of properties' improvements must be considered in tax assessment, according to Colorado Supreme Court case `Arapahoe County Board of Equalization v. Podoll.' Facts of the case; Ruling in the lower and appellate courts; Legal basis of the ruling.

  • More experts share assessor responses.  // Property Tax Alert;Jun2010, Vol. 16 Issue 6, p5 

    The article presents feedback from tax experts Joseph J. Calvanico from Chicago and Donald J. Swartz from Kansas with regard assessor views on taxpayer calls to reduce assessments.

  • Tax assessment of special-purpose properties: Use of value... Williamson, Richard F.; Chappell, Sam M. // Appraisal Journal;Oct97, Vol. 65 Issue 4, p413 

    Discusses what should be the basis of tax assessment of special purpose properties in the United States, use value or market value. Considerations on equalization and tax policy; States that allows use value; States that do not allow use value.

  • Assessing your assessment$. Battersby, Mark E. // American Nurseryman;12/1/95, Vol. 182 Issue 11, p52 

    Discusses the problems related to real estate taxes on properties owned by business. Inaccuracy of property assessments; Approaches in assessing the value of a given property; Steps to correct the errors found on the assessment record. INSET: Murky waters, by Beth L. Gainer..

  • Taxing dates.  // Northern Colorado Business Report;5/8/2009, Vol. 14 Issue 17, p24 

    The article presents dates for property taxes and assessments from May 2009 to June 2010 in Colorado.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics