TITLE

No Child Left Behind Act: Education's Data Improvement Efforts Could Strengthen the Basis for Distributing Title III Funds: GAO-07-140

AUTHOR(S)
Ashby, Cornelia
PUB. DATE
December 2006
SOURCE
GAO Reports;12/7/2006, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Documents
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLBA) designates federal funds to support the education of students with limited English proficiency and provides for formula-based grants to states. This report describes the data the Education Department used to distribute Title III funds and the implications of data measurement issues for the two allowable sources of data-- American Community Survey (ACS) and state assessment data--for allocating funds across states. In addition, the report describes changes in federal funding to support these students under NCLBA and how states and school districts used these funds as well as Education's Title III oversight and support to states. To address these objectives, GAO reviewed documentation on ACS and state data, interviewed federal and state officials, and collected data from 12 states, 11 districts, and 6 schools. Education used ACS data to distribute Title III funds, but measurement issues with both ACS and state data could result in funding differences. Education used ACS data primarily because state data were incomplete. In September, Education officials told us they were developing plans to clarify instructions for state data submissions to address identified inconsistencies. While Education officials expected their efforts to improve the quality of the data, they told us that they had not established criteria or a methodology to determine the relative accuracy of the two data sources. State data represent the number of students with limited English proficiency assessed annually for English proficiency, and ACS data are based in part on responses to subjective English ability questions from a sample of the population. ACS data showed large increases and decreases in numbers of these students from 2003 to 2004 in part due to sample size. ACS data and state counts of students with limited English proficiency for the 12 study states differed. GAO's simulation of the distribution of Title III funds for fiscal years 2005 and 2006 based on these numbers showed that there would be differences in how much funding states would receive. In fiscal year 2006, Congress authorized over $650 million in Title III funding for students with limited English proficiency--an increase of over $200 million since fiscal year 2001 under NCLBA. This increase in funding as well as the change in how funds are distributed--from a primarily discretionary grant program to a formula grant program--contributed to more districts receiving federal funding to support students with limited English proficiency since the enactment of NCLBA. States and school districts used Title III funds to support programs and activities including language instruction and professional development. Education provided oversight and support to states. Officials from 5 of the 12 study states reported overall satisfaction with the support from Education. However, some officials indicated that they needed more guidance in certain...
ACCESSION #
23420974

 

Related Articles

  • No Child Left Behind Act: Additional Assistance and Research on Effective Strategies Would Help Small Rural Districts: GAO-04-909. Shaul, Marnie S. // GAO Reports;9/23/2004, p1 

    To improve the academic achievement of the nation's 48 million school-aged children, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) introduced significant changes to state, district, and school accountability for student performance and teacher qualifications. Congress has raised concerns about...

  • The Rocky Year Of Reading First. Pressley, Michael // Education Week;12/14/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 15, p24 

    The article focuses on the problems associated with Reading First, a federal reading effort in the U.S. intended to improve reading instruction in the primary grades. Complaints against the initiative over the past six years have led to an investigation by the U.S. Government Accountability...

  • The 'Shut It Down' Mentality. SLVIN, ROBERT // Education Week;11/2/2011, Vol. 31 Issue 10, p9 

    An excerpt from the blog post "The 'Shut It Down' Mentality," from the blog Sputnik by Robert Slavin, is presented which discusses the option of school closure under the U.S. School Improvement Grants program and the No Child Left Behind Act.

  • Grants in NCLB To Aid Teaching Under Scrutiny. Sawchuk, Stephen // Education Week;12/3/2008, Vol. 28 Issue 14, p1 

    The article reports on the results of a study by the think tank Education Sector, showing that the impact of federal funds spent on improving teacher quality under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is unclear. The report's recommendations for improving the way the Teacher and Principal...

  • the teachers' lounge. Barlow, Dudley // Education Digest;Mar2006, Vol. 71 Issue 7, p64 

    The article presents information on developments related to education in the U.S. As a result of the alarming announcements which have been heard with regard to American students performing poorly on standardized tests when they are compared with students in other countries, standardized tests...

  • AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAMS. J.L.T. // Education Week;1/4/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 16, p12 

    The article reports that twenty-six states in the U.S. did not make any new grants for afterschool programs in 2005, according to a study by the Afterschool Alliance, Washington-based advocacy group. Funding for after-school programs was promised under the No Child Left Behind Act, but has yet...

  • New York, Arizona At Odds With Ed. Dept. English Testing. Zehr, Mary Ann // Education Week;7/12/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 42, p28 

    The article reports that federal education officials have told New York Commissioner of Education Richard P. Mills that his state must change the way it tests English-learners or lose federal aid. Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, states must include English-language learners in...

  • No Child Left Behind Act: Education Actions Needed to Improve Implementation and Evaluation of Supplemental Educational Services: GAO-06-1121T. Ashby, Cornelia M. // GAO Reports;9/21/2006, p1 

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) requires districts with schools receiving Title I funds that have not met state performance goals for 3 consecutive years to offer low-income students enrolled in these schools supplemental educational services (SES), such as tutoring. This testimony...

  • GAO Report Positive On Reading First, But Confirms Problems. Manzo, Kathleen Kennedy // Education Week;3/28/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 29, p6 

    The article reports on both progress and problems stemming from the Reading First initiative of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act. A March 2007 Government Accountability Office report acknowledges changes and improvements to reading instruction in U.S. schools, but faults the Department of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics