TITLE

"LEWD AND IMMORAL": NUDE DANCING, SEXUAL EXPRESSION, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT

AUTHOR(S)
Case, Kevin
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
Chicago-Kent Law Review;2006, Vol. 81 Issue 3, p1185
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Nude dancing is a particularly awkward fit with the First Amendment. Should the Constitution protect this kind of "speech?" The question has vexed the Supreme Court. While most of the Court has agreed that nude dancing falls within the First Amendment, plurality opinions relegate nude dancing to the "outer ambit" of shielded speech, setting forth confusing and ultimately unsustainable legal tests. This Note contends that nude dancing can convey powerful and particularized erotic messages of sexual desire, availability, and appreciation of the nude female form. It is not mere "conduct." Moreover, arguments for categorizing nude dancing as "low value" speech, such as those grounded in morality or aesthetics, fail to provide a principled basis for affording nude dancing lesser protection than is given to other types of expressive activity. This Note thus concludes that nude dancing should receive full First Amendment protection, and that attempts to regulate it should receive no lesser degree of Constitutional scrutiny.
ACCESSION #
23013030

 

Related Articles

  • PUBLIC FORUMS, SELECTIVE SUBSIDIES, AND SHIFTING STANDARDS OF VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION. Casarez, Nicole B. // Albany Law Review;2000, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p501 

    Argues that the United States Supreme Court has erred in treating the First Amendment concept of viewpoint discrimination in nonpublic forums and nonforum government funding allocations. Application of the prohibition on viewpoint discrimination in a speech protective manner in the traditional...

  • Harry Reid's assault on free speech. Cornyn, U. S. Sen. John // Wilson County News;6/11/2014, Vol. 41 Issue 24, p10A 

    The author reflects on the changes in the Constitutional Bill of Rights which limit the right for a free speech under the First Amendment protected by the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • In the Line of Fire: Reconsidering the Holmes of Schenck and the Holmes of Abrams. Dewberry, David R. // Free Speech Yearbook;2005, Vol. 42, p17 

    The article focuses on the importance of the First Amendment in the U.S. in lawsuits related to free speech. The judgments delivered by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes illustrate the significance of the First Amendment in such cases. Holmes had given different rulings for same type of trials....

  • THE SEMANTICS OF SYMBOLIC SPEECH. Berckmans, Paul // Law & Philosophy;May1997, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p145 

    More than half a century ago, the Supreme Court held that the free speech protection of the First Amendment is not limited to verbal communication, but also applies to such expressive conduct as saluting a flag or burning a flag. Even though the Supreme Court has decided a number of important...

  • Academic Freedom in Political Perspective. Bell, Derrick // Works & Days;2008/2009, Vol. 26/27, p253 

    The article provides information on the issues concerning the academic freedom. It states that human freedoms are protected by the Bill of Rights such as the First Amendment's free speech rights. It also notes that the U.S. Supreme Court has sought to encompass academic freedom within the...

  • A Robust Public Debate: Realizing Free Speech in Workplace Representation Elections. Andrias, Kate E. // Yale Law Journal;Jun2003, Vol. 112 Issue 8, p2415 

    Challenges the approach of the U.S. Supreme Court to the First Amendment of the Constitution for failing both to recognize and to protect the very real speech interests of workers and union organizers at stake in workplace representation elections. Means to safeguard employer speech from state...

  • Why You Don't Talk About Your Third Amendment Rights. Liptak, Adam // New York Times Upfront;12/12/2011, Vol. 144 Issue 7, p21 

    The article explains why the U.S. rights to freedom of speech and religion, originally slated to be the Third Amendment in the U.S. Bill of Rights in 1789, became the First Amendment rights.

  • First Amendment follies. Weissman, Robert // Multinational Monitor;May98, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p15 

    Deals with the protection offered by the United States First Amendment on the free speech right of corporations. How the First Amendment of the Constitution was established; Evolution of the commercial speech line; Debate on the marketing of tobacco products.

  • Understand First Amendment rights. MOORE, ROBERT // Ohio Farmer;Feb2014, Vol. 310 Issue 2, p47 

    The article provides information to the people of the U.S. about the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which protects freedom of speech, and mentions the Bill of Rights, the first 10 constitutional amendments which protect the people from government interference.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics