TITLE

Trim defense budget, bolster health funding, advocates say

PUB. DATE
September 1999
SOURCE
Nation's Health;Sep99, Vol. 29 Issue 8, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the call of health advocates in the United States for the increase in government health funding instead of alloting billions on the defense budget. Critical health needs that should be prioritized in health funding; Comment from Mohammad Akhter, executive director of the American Public Health Association; Significance of such diversion of funds.
ACCESSION #
2264834

 

Related Articles

  • Health Care Is Casualty in Current Budget Battle. Scott, Jeanne Schulte // hfm (Healthcare Financial Management);Mar2002, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p28 

    Addresses healthcare finance issues being debated in preparing the fiscal year 2003 budget of the U.S. Proposals of U.S. President George W. Bush; Breakdown of funding in various states; Problems faced by politicians.

  • Disease burden predicts US government health research funding.  // Bulletin of the World Health Organization;1999, Vol. 77 Issue 8, p704 

    Focuses on the role of the burden of the disease in determining health research funding in the United States. Effect of using disability-adjusted life year measurement to calculate disease burden; Implications for policy-makers outside the US; Factors considered in the allocation of research...

  • Senators call for biodefence boost. Knight, Jonathan // Nature;10/4/2001, Vol. 413 Issue 6855, p441 

    Reports on a proposal by two senators calling for increased public-health spending to prepare the United States for a possible terrorist attack with biological weapons. Overview of federal spending on and the status of the U.S. with regards to bioterrorism readiness; Specific amount called for.

  • House cuts OSHA, NLRB spending, bans enforcement of ergonomics rules.  // Traffic World;8/14/95, Vol. 243 Issue 7, p15 

    Reports on funding cuts for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under a 1996 appropriations bill passed by the US House of Representatives. Prohibition of OSHA from issuing a rule on ergonomic protection; Increase in OSHA's...

  • Clinton seeks to expand coverage and Medicare. Wechsler, Jill // Managed Healthcare;Mar2000, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p8 

    Reports on the proposal to use the projected 2001 budget surplus to expand healthcare coverage and Medicare program in the United States. Amount reserved for health services; Health services that will be provided through the budget; Projected sources of Medicare expansion.

  • Appropriations high on agenda for Congress' return to work. Figura, Susannah Zak // AHA News;09/01/97, Vol. 33 Issue 34, p3 

    Focuses on fiscal year 1998 appropriations bills, authorizing discretionary funding for nonentitlement health care programs in the United States, expected to be at the top of Congress' post-Labor Day agenda. Compromise amendment expected in the House; Background on the existing discretionary...

  • Federal funds begin flowing to states for public health improvements. Szabo, Joan // MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer;Mar2002, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p44 

    Focuses on the appropriation of funds by U.S. state governments to improve public health infrastructure preparedness for possible biological attacks. Uses of the funds; Implication of the funding initiative; Role of public laboratories.

  • Funding concerns lead to new focus on public health finance. Johnson, Teddi Dineley // Nation's Health;Sep2007, Vol. 37 Issue 7, p15 

    This article reports on the new movement that would advance the field of U.S. public health finance as a subfield within public health. The movement is aimed at strengthening the nation's public health system and ensure its sustainability. Fueling the effort is a growing sense of urgency to...

  • Educational technology funding on the chopping block. Salpeter, Judy; Kinnaman, Daniel E. // Tech & Learning;Apr95, Vol. 15 Issue 7, p52 

    Reports on programs, with a direct impact on the future of technology in the schools, that are targeted for cuts or elimination in the United States. Includes Star Schools; National Challenge Grants for Technology in Education; Goals 2000.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics