TITLE

Vagueness as a Virtue: Why the Supreme Court Decided the Ten Commandments Cases Inexactly Right

AUTHOR(S)
Schaps, Mike
PUB. DATE
July 2006
SOURCE
California Law Review;Jul2006, Vol. 94 Issue 4, p1243
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information regarding the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in considering the ten commandments cases. The Court has developed a workable Establishment Clause standard for cases involving government religious displays and prayers. The standard is described as vague but, it provide lower courts with sufficient guidance to decide in most cases.
ACCESSION #
22288267

 

Related Articles

  • Three Supreme Court cases to watch.  // Our Sunday Visitor;11/1/2009, Vol. 98 Issue 27, p6 

    The article offers information on the Salazar v. Buono case facing the U.S. Supreme Court, along with others identified by "Time" magazine as cases to watch out for.

  • In Other Huge Ruling: Court Picks the 1% Over Workers. WALSH, JOAN // Progressive Populist;8/1/2014, Vol. 20 Issue 13, p14 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in the cases Harris v. Quinn and Hobby Lobby Inc. dealing with women's rights.

  • The Supreme Court agreed to hear several cases. McLaughlin, Abraham; Mutch, David // Christian Science Monitor;9/28/95, Vol. 87 Issue 213, p2 

    Informs about US Supreme Court agreeing to hear several cases. Names of the cases for consideration.

  • Not-so-big issues. Stewart, David O. // ABA Journal;Oct93, Vol. 79 Issue 10, p58 

    Discusses various controversial cases pending before the United States Supreme Court. Opinion of the Supreme Court on the issues of abortion rights, the right-to-die, and capital punishment; Death penalty cases; Applications of the Eighth Amendment; Forfeiture cases; Arbitrariness of the court...

  • UNITED STATES V. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD: A NEW TEST FOR NONSHAREHOLDER.... Pearson, Brooke // Tax Lawyer;Spring74, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p503 

    Comments on the decision of the Supreme Court in United States versus Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad. Evaluation on the critical characteristics of capital contributions; Role of capital contributions to the issues of depreciation; Assessment on the historical contributions to capital.

  • On the docket.  // ABA Journal;Sep95, Vol. 81 Issue 9, p39 

    Presents cases being argued before the United States Supreme Court. More versus Republican Party of Virginia; BMW of North America, Inc. versus Gore.

  • WHY Do CITIZENS LITIGATE OVER THE POSTING OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS? A CASE STUDY FROM TENNESSEE. Astoria, Ross // Quinnipiac Law Review;2012, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p691 

    The article presents information on the litigation regarding the posting of the Ten Commandments with respect to two cases filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Tennessee on the same grounds. The cases were filed by the ACLU due to the violation of the federal laws of the U.S. by...

  • High court to hear case on monument displays.  // Christian Century;5/6/2008, Vol. 125 Issue 9, p18 

    The article reports on the agreement of U.S. Supreme Court justices to hear a case involving a 47-year-old monument to the Decalogue in a Utah city park. The justices will consider whether its presence in the park as the gift of a private organization gives a local sect that is younger than the...

  • Reply Brief.  // Supreme Court Debates;May2005, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p150 

    The article presents information on the reply brief of the petitioner in the case related to the Ten Commandment as submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on February 22, 2005. On the grounds of the Texas State Capitol there is one prominent religious symbol: a large Ten Commandments monument...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics