TITLE

U.S. SUPREME COURT AFFIRMS DEPORTATION ORDER UNDER IIRIRA OVER OBJECTIONS THAT PETITIONER'S ILLEGAL RE-ENTRY OF U. S. TOOK PLACE BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE OF STATUTE

PUB. DATE
June 2006
SOURCE
International Law Update;Jun2006, Vol. 12, p111
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court affirmation regarding the deportation order under Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) in the U.S. Immigration law provides that the Immigration & Naturalization Service may recreate an order for removing an alien unlawfully. The IIRIRA amended the Immigration and Nationality Act to expand the class of illegal re-entrants whose orders may restrain and to restrict the range of relief available.
ACCESSION #
21557458

 

Related Articles

  • Deportation no longer 'collateral'. Wolfe, Andrew // New Hampshire Business Review;5/21/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 10, p28 

    The article offers information on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the deportation of non-citizen immigrants due to crime conviction. It mentions that the ruling deportation for the case of Padilla vs. Kentucky requires the defense lawyer to inform the non-citizen clients on the status of...

  • Legal Immigrants Can Be Jailed. St. Gerard, Vanessa // Corrections Today;Aug2003, Vol. 65 Issue 5, p15 

    Reports on an order issued by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that legal immigrants who face deportation can be jailed automatically without bail in the country. Implications of the ruling for foreigners; Response of immigrant rights groups to the ruling; Clarification on the purpose of the order.

  • Will Supreme Court ruling on illegal immigrants pit Big Business against states? Jonsson, Patrik // Inside Tucson Business;6/3/2011, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p6 

    The article focuses on the stand of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on illegal immigrants and the aspects of other new immigration laws in Arizona.

  • Immigration law goes before Supreme Court.  // Hill;4/23/2012, Vol. 19 Issue 49, p10 

    The article reports that the judges at the Supreme Court in Los Angeles, California will decide on the immigration law in Arizona.

  • Arizona immigration law struck down: What it means.  // HR Specialist: Employment Law;Aug2012, Vol. 42 Issue 8, p5 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has reversed several provisions under the 2010 Arizona immigration law in 2012.

  • Supreme Court agrees to hear SB 1070 challenge.  // Inside Tucson Business;12/16/2011, Vol. 21 Issue 28, p3 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a lawsuit filed by the federal government against an anti-illegal immigration law of Arizona.

  • High court rules on state's SB 1070.  // Inside Tucson Business;6/29/2012, Vol. 21 Issue 57, p3 

    The article focuses on the decision or ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court, on the anti-illegal immigration statute called SB 1070, of Arizona.

  • Mass Equality's statement on the Supreme Court's Immigration ruling.  // Bay Windows;6/28/2012, Vol. 30 Issue 29, p7 

    The article informs that the U.S. Supreme Court has withheld the three key provisions of the 2010 Arizona immigration act, which includes arresting of immigrants without warrant, compulsion for immigrants to carry registration papers and preventing immigrants from seeking employment in the U.S.

  • SB 1070 appears bound for U.S. Supreme Court.  // Inside Tucson Business;4/15/2011, Vol. 20 Issue 47, p3 

    The article reports that Arizona's SB 1070 anti-illegal immigration law will be submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, California has determined that its key portions are preempted by federal law and cannot be enforced.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics