Emissions fall despite economic growth

Reichhardt, Tony
August 1999
Nature;8/5/1999, Vol. 400 Issue 6744, p494
Academic Journal
Reports that, according to a 1999 report by the Worldwatch Institute, global carbon emissions declined in 1998 while economic productivity increased. Evidence that cutting greenhouse gas emissions may not necessarily have a financial cost; Reports details; Impact of the Kyoto Protocol.


Related Articles

  • Look! Up in the Sky! Is it Really Global Warming. Skaer, Mark // Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration News;7/9/2001, Vol. 213 Issue 10, p27 

    Comments on the issue of global warming in the United States. Discussion of National Academy of Sciences on the steps on reducing threat of global warming; Decision of US President George W. Bush to withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol; Consequences of the treaty on the economy.

  • TECHNOLOGIES TO REDUCE CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS IN THE NEXT DECADE. Rosenfeld, Arthur H.; Kaarsberg, Tina M.; Romm, Joseph // Physics Today;Nov2000, Vol. 53 Issue 11, p29 

    Deals with the concerns on the global impact of greenhouse emission. Details on the Kyoto Protocol drafted in December 1997; History of energy consumption since 1973; Discussion on the studies that assessed the United States potential to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. INSETS: Low-Emissivity...

  • Kyoto protocol could cost US jobs without helping the environment.  // Chemical Market Reporter;01/18/99, Vol. 255 Issue 3, p32 

    Looks at the effect of the Kyoto Protocol on global warming on the job in the United States' (US) industries, including chemical industry according to a research published in `Energy Policy.' Job lost in the US aluminum industry; Details on the protocol.

  • Europe's Kyoto Approval Paves Way for Ratification. Young, Ian // Chemical Week;3/13/2002, Vol. 164 Issue 11, p11 

    Reports the approval of the European Commission's proposed ratification of Kyoto Protocol on climate change in Europe. Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions; Withdrawal of the United States on the support for the Kyoto agreement; Proposal of the U.S. to tackle climate change.

  • Building on the Paris Agreement. Lozowski, Dorothy // Chemical Engineering;Dec2016, Vol. 123 Issue 12, p5 

    The author focuses on the Paris Agreement, an international agreement made at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21) in Paris, France, which aims to lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Topics include the enforcement of the...

  • Technology roadmap for low carbon society in China. Jiang Kejun; Liu Qiang; Zhuang Xing; Hu Xiulian // Journal of Renewable & Sustainable Energy;May2010, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p031008 

    Mid- and long-term energy requirements and greenhouse gas emission scenarios for China were presented by using the Integrated Policy Assessment Model of China. Technologies are the key component to reach a low carbon future. Technologies are identified with the scenario analysis. In order to...

  • Indispensability and Indefensibility? The United States in the Climate Treaty Negotiations. Agrawala, Shardul; Andresen, Steinar // Global Governance;Oct-Dec99, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p457 

    The United States has a penchant these days for joining international negotiations that spin out of control. We went to Kyoto to talk about climate change and discovered we couldn't sign the treaty. We went to Ottawa to talk about landmines and found our military problems ignored by other...

  • High stakes. Vrolijk, Christian // World Today;Nov2000, Vol. 56 Issue 11, p25 

    States the implications of the flexibility of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on climatic changes. Failure of the agreement to prescribe the gas emissions which need to be reduced; Controversy surrounding emissions trading; Significance of the Kyoto Protocol.

  • Time to act now? Assessing the costs of delaying climate measures and benefits of early action. Jakob, Michael; Luderer, Gunnar; Steckel, Jan; Tavoni, Massimo; Monjon, Stephanie // Climatic Change;Sep2012, Vol. 114 Issue 1, p79 

    This paper compares the results of the three state of the art climate-energy-economy models IMACLIM-R, ReMIND-R, and WITCH to assess the costs of climate change mitigation in scenarios in which the implementation of a global climate agreement is delayed or major emitters decide to participate in...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics