TITLE

High Access, Low Priority

AUTHOR(S)
Chitty, Haley
PUB. DATE
June 2006
SOURCE
University Business;Jun2006, Vol. 9 Issue 6, p45
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article comments on the reluctance of U.S. lawmakers to prioritize need-based student aid in local, state and federal budgets. The failure of federal lawmakers to realize the contribution of higher education to the U.S. society is criticized. The article also explains the misperceptions of the public about higher education.
ACCESSION #
21333363

 

Related Articles

  • Federal Allocation and its Utilization in the Science Laboratories University of Benin, Edo State, Nigeria. Osagie, Roseline O. // National Teacher Education Journal;Summer2014, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p5 

    This study investigated the financial resources allocated to the University of Benin by the Federal Government and the utilization of such funds in the science laboratories between 1992/93 to 1996/97 academic sessions. The Dean and the Heads of the Departments of Physics, Chemistry, Zoology and...

  • OPTIMAL FINANCIAL AID POLICIES FOR A SELECTIVE UNIVERSITY. Ehrenberg, Ronald G.; Sherman, Daniel R. // Journal of Human Resources;Spring84, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p202 

    ABSTRACT Our paper provides a model of optimal financial aid policies for a selective university. The model implies that the financial aid package to be offered to each category of admitted applicants depends on the elasticity of the fraction who accept offers of admission with respect to the...

  • HIGHER EDUCATION ACT SUMMARY.  // Art Education;Feb66, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p34 

    The article focuses on the Higher Education Act of 1965 in U.S. This act authorizes a wide range of programs which provide aids to colleges and college students. This act authorizes scholarships for undergraduate students based on their need and academic ability as well as a program of...

  • Ends and Means in the Finance of Higher Education. Thomson, Procter // Journal of Higher Education;Nov1952, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p429 

    The article presents the reasons for the government of the United States extend financial support to American universities and colleges. In a country like the United States where democracy is highly valued, social welfare such as education availability is a factor that determine social freedom....

  • Lawmakers Consider Shifting Aid from Ivies to Public Colleges. Boulard, Garry // Community College Week;4/26/2004, Vol. 16 Issue 19, p10 

    Reports on the plans of U.S. legislators to alter the distribution of federal-aid programs for universities and colleges as of April 2004. Conflicts in the U.S. House of Representatives regarding the distribution of campus-based federal aids; Goal of the Republican leadership in proposing the...

  • @ the coalface. Hill, David // Computer Bulletin;Jul2004, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p34 

    The author addresses concerns about changes to university funding in Great Britain as of July 2004. He says that there are three broad categories of human performance, namely, skills-based performance, rule-based performance and knowledge-based performance. He explains why knowledge-based...

  • Saving Independent Colleges. Kirk, Russell // National Review;5/23/1975, Vol. 27 Issue 19, p562 

    The article reflects on the conditions of independent colleges in United States. According to the author, it would be impossible for independent colleges and universities to exist ten years from now if they are going to rely on government assistance and donations from charitable foundations....

  • Untitled.  // Adults Learning;Apr2007, Vol. 18 Issue 8, p6 

    The article reports on the appeal by the UHI Millennium Institute for extra capital and revenue cash from the Scottish Executive. The institute believes that creating and developing a university for the Highlands and Islands will need another £100 million. The finance, according to the...

  • The Jet Set in State Tax Support of Higher Education. Chambers, M. M. // Journal of Higher Education;Mar1970, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p213 

    The article talks about the rate of gain in appropriations of state tax funds for operating expenses of higher education. Seven of the top 14 states include: Hawaii with 742 percent, New York with 696 percent, Maine with 674 percent, Massachusetts with 601 percent, Connecticut with 554 percent,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics