Clean Water: How States Allocate Revolving Loan Funds and Measure Their Benefits: GAO-06-579

Stephenson, John B.
June 2006
GAO Reports;6/8/2006, p1
Government Document
Communities will need hundreds of billions of dollars in coming years to construct and upgrade wastewater treatment facilities, sewer systems, and other water infrastructure. To finance these efforts, they will rely heavily on low-interest loans from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) program to supplement their own funds. Through fiscal year 2005, states have used their CWSRFs to provide communities over $52 billion for a variety of water quality projects. The Clean Water Act allows states to use their CWSRFs to (1) construct or improve conventional wastewater infrastructure, (2) control diffuse (nonpoint) sources of pollution such as agricultural runoff and leaking septic systems, and (3) protect federally-designated estuaries. Given the states' flexibility in determining how to spend CWSRF dollars, GAO was asked to examine (1) the extent to which states use their CWSRF dollars to support conventional wastewater treatment infrastructure versus other qualifying expenses, (2) the strategies states use to allocate their CWSRF dollars among qualifying expenses, and (3) the measures states use to ensure that their allocation strategies result in the most efficient and effective use of CWSRF dollars. EPA reviewed a report draft, providing technical comments that were incorporated. Since 1987, states have used 96 percent (about $50 billion) of their CWSRF dollars to build, upgrade, or enlarge conventional wastewater treatment facilities and conveyances. Projects to build or improve wastewater treatment plants alone account for over 60 percent of this amount, with the remainder supporting the construction or rehabilitation of sewer and storm water collection systems. CWSRF assistance for nonpoint source activities represents only 4 percent (about $2 billion) of CWSRF dollars, although it accounts for over a quarter of all CWSRF projects financed. To date, 37 states report using some portion of their CWSRF funds to directly support nonpoint source activities. Nationwide, 23 percent of CWSRF funds (64 percent of all CWSRF loan agreements) were devoted to water quality projects in communities with populations of less than 10,000 people. The 50 states (and Puerto Rico) have used a variety of strategies to allocate CWSRF funds to meet their individual needs. For example, the state of Washington sets aside 20 percent of its CWSRF dollars to support nonpoint source projects, while Alabama state law defines only traditional public wastewater treatment facilities as appropriate projects under its CWSRF program. Other states have designed their programs to target selected types of borrowers. Pennsylvania, for example, has targeted borrowers in small or rural communities during the allocation process. According to EPA and state officials, states' allocation strategies may change as certain states' priorities and clean water needs shift. Among the reasons are (1) aging wastewater infrastructure in...


Related Articles

  • Mix nixed. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;5/23/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p1 

    This article reports that the U.S. federal environmental regulators, reacting to criticism from the public and members of the U.S. Congress, have dropped plans to finalize a sewage blending policy unveiled in November 2003 that was favored by operators of wastewater treatment systems. The U.S....

  • PHARMACEUTICALS AND EDCS in the US Water Industry--An Update. Snyder, Erin M.; Pleus, Richard C.; Snyder, Shane A. // Journal: American Water Works Association;Nov2005, Vol. 97 Issue 11, p32 

    The article focuses on the development of analytical chemistry methods for detecting smaller concentrations of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals in water. These emerging contaminants appear to be ubiquitous in municipal wastewater treatment plant effluents and in surface...

  • EPA releases new list of small system technologies.  // WaterWorld;Nov/Dec98, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p9 

    Reports that the United States Environmental Protection Agency released its Small System Compliance Technology List for the Surface Water Treatment Rule or sewage purification rules. Includes listings on the capabilities, water quality concerns, operational and maintenance requirements for...

  • Chemical Industry Supports EPA Withdrawal of Impaired Water Rule.  // Chemical Market Reporter;3/24/2003, Vol. 263 Issue 12, p9 

    Focuses on the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to withdraw a rule revising the federal program for cleaning up impaired waters in the U.S. Reasons for the move of the EPA; Support of the chemical industry for the decision of the agency; Importance of the rule in...

  • EPA Revises Exemptions for Wastewater Treatment.  // Professional Safety;Dec2005, Vol. 50 Issue 12, p49 

    The article focuses on the finalization of the revisions to the wastewater treatment exemptions for hazardous waste mixtures initiated by Environmental Protection Agency in the U.S. The agency is taking steps to provide flexible and environmentally sound regulatory management through: (1)...

  • NO SEWAGE BLENDING.  // Pollution Engineering;Jul2005, Vol. 37 Issue 7, p6 

    This article reports the decision of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency not to allow sewage plants to skip a process for disinfecting water after heavy rains and snow melts. Benjamin Grumbles, assistant administrator for the Office of Water, emphasizes the agency's goal of reducing...

  • NEHA's New CIOWTS Credential.  // Journal of Environmental Health;Sep2006, Vol. 69 Issue 2, p43 

    This article presents information on the Certified Installer of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (CIOWTS) developed by the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) through an agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. CIOWTS was shown in June 2006 at the 2006 San Antonio...

  • The yuck factor. Truini, Joe // Waste News;2/18/2008, Vol. 13 Issue 21, p1 

    The article reports that planned systems to recycle wastewater into drinking water have been opposed in the U.S., despite water shortage in many areas in the country. Public perception is definitely the biggest challenge to recycling of wastewater, said Zachary Dorsey, a spokesman for the...

  • Courts finds EPA went too far in Clean Water Act enforcement in Virginia. Day, Doug; Dayton, Scottie // Onsite Installer;Jun2013, p28 

    The article presents updates on rules and regulations that concern the onsite wastewater treatment installation industry. A Federal District Court in Alexandria, Virginia has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has exceeded its authority in its enforcement of the Clean Water Act...


Read the Article

Other Topics