Lance This Boil

Forbes, Steve
February 2006
Forbes Asia;2/13/2006, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p13
The article presents information on a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that denies the U.S. attorney general the right to bar physicians from implementing Oregon's assisted suicide law. The law is being favored by a majority of justices, but the same majority opposed state laws barring sodomy. A perversion of democracy occurs when judges are issuing diktats on issues that should be in the hands of the people's elected representatives.


Related Articles

  • A matter of life or death. Taylor, Mark // Modern Healthcare;1/23/2006, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p6 

    The article focuses on the decision issued by the U.S. Supreme Court in January 2006 to uphold a physician-assisted suicide law in Oregon. It mentions the impact of the ruling on the physician-patient relationship. Information is provided on a rule issued by former U.S. attorney general John...

  • Assisted Suicide Advocates Push Dangerous Legislation in Unprecedented Number of States -- Early Victories and Looming Problems Emerge. Popik, Jennifer // National Right to Life News;Feb2015, p17 

    The article reports that Compassion and Choices, a group that promotes doctor-prescribed suicide, has received the introduction of legislation in several state legislatures in the U.S. Topics mentioned include a decision by a state court in New Mexico to strike its ban on assisting suicide, a...

  • AL'S NEW FRIENDS. Bacon Jr., Perry; Tumulty, Karen // Time International (South Pacific Edition);7/18/2005, Issue 28, p7 

    The article focuses on the political battle over the possible nomination of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales for the United States Supreme Court seat. There has been an outcry from social conservatives in the United States over Gonzales' nomination. It is informed that conservatives...

  • AND THE NOMINEES ARE. Crowther, Prudence; Sorel, Edward // New Yorker;12/20/2004, Vol. 80 Issue 40, p190 

    Describes peculiarities of imagined nominees for the United States Supreme Court justices. Former state attorney general's view of single women; Amicus brief authored by a state Supreme Court justice charging a defendant for giving aid and comfort to enemies of the U.S.; District Court judge's...

  • Poll: Most agree with assisted suicide ruling. L.J. // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);07/14/97, Vol. 44 Issue 28, p29 

    Reports that majority of the respondents in the survey by `This Week' periodical supported the US Supreme Court's ruling that terminally ill patients do not have a constitutional right to doctor-assisted suicide.

  • Supreme Court faces life or death question. Savage, David G. // State Legislatures;Oct/Nov96, Vol. 22 Issue 9, p20 

    Focuses on the US Supreme Court's interpretation of laws on assisted suicide in the United States. Lower court rulings on cases of assisted suicide; Other issues to be heard by Supreme Court such as cases on sexual predators; Brady Act; Lawsuits against state officials; Child support...

  • Supreme Court Allows Use of Federally Controlled Drugs to Assist Suicide. Balch, Burke J. // National Right to Life News;Feb2006, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p1 

    Focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to allow the use of federally controlled narcotics to assist suicide as of January 2006. State which has laws governing assisted suicide; Legislators who supported the decision, terms of the decision.

  • U.S. Supreme Court rules against physician-assisted suicide. Dale, David C.; Federman, Daniel D. // Cortlandt Forum;03/25/98, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p29 

    Highlights the US Supreme Court's ruling which states that there is no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide. Restriction of physician's ability to prescribe medication for patients who will not improve the care of living; Attempt to establish a constitutional right to...

  • Rights and the Political Process: Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Aftermath of Washington v. Glucksberg. Dinan, John // Publius: The Journal of Federalism;Fall2001, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p1 

    Focuses on a study which examined the consequences of the 1997 Washington versus Glucksberg case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court deferred the issue of physician-assisted suicide to the state's political processes. Principal benefit of deferential judicial decisions; Information on the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics