TITLE

AN EVOLVING CONFLICT

AUTHOR(S)
Tebo, Margaret Graham
PUB. DATE
March 2006
SOURCE
ABA Journal;Mar2006, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p20
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses issues involving the legality of the mandatory teaching of intelligent design in Los Angeles, California. Intelligent design is not creationism, which the U.S. Supreme Court barred from the public school curriculum in 1987 according to lawyer Casey Luskin. After parents of students studying in public schools in Los Angeles filed a case, the course on intelligent design was pulled. Information on the organization Discovery Institute was also provided.
ACCESSION #
20086907

 

Related Articles

  • One Nation, Under... The Watchmaker?: Intelligent Design and the Establishment Clause. Schuneman, Nicholas A. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p179 

    The article examines the constitutionality of teaching the Intelligent Design hypothesis in public schools in the U.S. The Intelligent Design hypothesis is primarily a response to and critique of the theory of evolution by natural selection, which was first elaborated by Charles Darwin. This...

  • Ohio Education Board Reverses Course On Promoting 'Intelligent-Design' Creationism.  // Church & State;Mar2006, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p17 

    The article reports on the decision of the Ohio Education Board to eliminate intelligent design from the state science standards. Americans United threatened to file a case against the removal of evolution instruction in schools. Other critics of intelligent design usage claimed that the lesson...

  • Immunology in the spotlight at the Dover 'Intelligent Design' trial. Bottaro, Andrea; Inlay, Matt A.; Matzke, Nicholas J. // Nature Immunology;May2006, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p433 

    The article reflects on the issue regarding the introduction of intelligent design in a biology class in one of the public schools in the U.S. Several government agencies and religious institutions, assisted with scientific support by the National Center for Science Education, a nonprofit...

  • Class Dismissed!: How The AU Team Tackled ID In California. Lynn, Barry W. // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p23 

    The article discusses the battle of the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State against the teaching of intelligent design in Frazier Mountain High School in California. The course was viewed as a kind of infomercial for creationism and is thought to violate the church-state...

  • Utah School Officials Reject 'Intelligent Design'  // Church & State;Oct2005, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p3 

    Reports that Utah's State Board of Education has rejected a proposal to introduce intelligent design (ID) into public school science courses. Basis of the school officials in rejecting the proposal; Preference of the board to keep evolution in the biology curriculum; Assertion of the board...

  • California.  // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;May-Aug2005, Vol. 25 Issue 3/4, p15 

    The article reports on the views made by California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell during a conference at the Los Angeles Natural History Museum on September 28, 2005, regarding the decision of public school science classes in the state to accept intelligent design....

  • Teaching Evolution: An Overview. Aliprandini, Michael; McMahon, Maureen // Points of View: Teaching Evolution;3/1/2016, p1 

    The article examines the debate over the teaching of evolution or creationism in U.S. public schools. Evolutionary theory proposes that the development of life is a process which has been occurring over billions of years, leading to the diversity of life forms on earth, while creationism...

  • Point: Canadian Classrooms Should Focus on Science and not Religion. Parent, Gabrielle; Renneboog, Richard // Canadian Points of View: Teaching Evolution;2016, p2 

    The article presents an argument for teaching evolution. The author argues that the theory of evolution is central to modern biology and should be taught to all students. Incidents of requiring creationism or intelligent design to be taught in place of evolution are discussed. Particular focus...

  • What They're Saying.  // Curriculum Review;Mar2006, Vol. 45 Issue 7, p3 

    The article presents views from public figures and personalities on issues related to education and curriculum. In a ruling by federal judge John E Jones III, he opines that while intelligent arguments may be true, a proposition on which the court takes no position, intelligent design is not...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics