TITLE

How dumb is intelligent design?

AUTHOR(S)
Silver, Douglas B.
PUB. DATE
December 2005
SOURCE
Mining Engineering;Dec2005, Vol. 57 Issue 12, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reflects on the concept of intelligent design. It compares the concept with that of the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin. It examines the reasons for the opposition of scientists to the concept. It discusses the concept in relation to the mining industry. It also examines the factors which contribute to the profitability of mining companies.
ACCESSION #
19857107

 

Related Articles

  • CHARLES DARWIN AND INTELLIGENT DESIGN. Lamoureux, Denis O. // Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies;2003, Vol. 15 Issue 1/2, p23 

    Focuses on the assumption regarding scientist Charles Darwin's rejection of the notion of intelligent design. Evolution of the term 'Darwinism' to be conflated with the dysteleological interpretation of evolution; Darwin's conceptualization of design; Biblical understanding of intelligent design.

  • Debating Design. Munro, Neil // National Journal;1/7/2006, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p36 

    The article presents a debate over intelligent design versus the arguments for or against the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin. To undermine the authority of evolution, intelligent-design advocates publish what they say are scientific critiques of evolution, highlight what they call...

  • Unintelligent Design. Durst, Will // Progressive;Oct2005, Vol. 69 Issue 10, p46 

    The article focuses on the significance of Intelligent Design (ID) in schools of the U.S. ID is just creationism with a container load of aluminum siding tacked on. One of the logic wedges Intelligent Designers like to jump onto with both semantic feet is the fact that scientist Charles Darwin...

  • 'Intelligent' Design? Garvey, John // Commonweal;8/12/2005, Vol. 132 Issue 14, p8 

    Reflects on the concept of intelligent design. Principle of Darwinian evolution; Reason for the decision of scientist Charles Darwin to reject the idea of a beneficent God; Arguments against the idea of intelligent design.

  • Who's afraid of Darwin? Frazzetto, Giovanni // EMBO Reports;Jul2004, Vol. 5 Issue 7, p662 

    Focuses on the controversies surrounding the teaching of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. Opposition of scientists to Italian minister for education and research Letizia Moratti's decision to abolish Darwinian theories from standard secondary school curricula; Efforts of the creationists to...

  • THE EVOLUTION WARS. Wallis, Claudia; August, Melissa; Caplan, Jeremy; Chu, Jeff; Richards, Constance E.; Healy, Rita; Maag, Christopher; Norman, Bud; Pitluk, Adam; Ressner, Jeffrey; Scully, Scan // Time International (South Pacific Edition);8/15/2005, Issue 32, p52 

    The article discusses intelligent design and scientist Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. Darwin's venerable theory is widely regarded as one of the best-supported ideas in science, the only explanation for the diversity of life on Earth, grounded in decades of study and objective evidence....

  • Looking at Nature Through Other Eyes: God's Governance of Nature in the Religion-Science Debate. Cook, Harry; Wood, John R. // Christian Scholar's Review;Spring2010, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p275 

    The article focuses on a debate on whether nature is created by God or through evolution. The author looks at Charles Darwin's theory which influenced the science versus religion debates, but argues that Darwin's personal experiences affected his theoretical thinking. He also discusses the...

  • Darwin in the blood. Gefter, Amanda // New Scientist;3/31/2007, Vol. 193 Issue 2597, p46 

    This article is an interview with Matthew Chapman, the great-great-grandson of British scientist, Charles Darwin. Chapman attended the trial in Dover, Pennsylvania where eleven parents sued the school district for teaching Intelligent Design in the classroom. In this interview he discusses the...

  • INTELLIGENT DESIGN AS AN ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION FOR THE EXISTENCE OF BIOMOLECULAR MACHINES. Behe, Michael J. // Rhetoric & Public Affairs;Winter98, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p565 

    The article discusses the author's reasons for not accepting the common explanation for the development of life. Gradualism is a requirement for Darwin's theory but certain biochemical systems are irreducibly complex and could not be formed, it is argued, in a gradual manner. The author provides...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics