TITLE

Judge Denies Summary Judgment in California's $3B Stem-Cell Bond Case

AUTHOR(S)
Saskal, Rich
PUB. DATE
December 2005
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;12/2/2005, Vol. 354 Issue 32270, p48
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the denial by a Superior Court judge in California of all parties' motions for summary judgment in California's $3b Stem-Cell Bond Case. The judge set the stage for a 2006 trial to determine the legality of a $3 billion ballot authorization for California bonds to finance stem-cell medical research under the state's constitution. While the plaintiffs are motivated by religious and ethical objections to the use of embryonic stem cells in medical research, their legal arguments put emphasis on the legality of the governing structure and financing arrangements for the stem-cell institute. INSET: San Diego Files Suit Against Four Firms..
ACCESSION #
19162765

 

Related Articles

  • With Lawsuit Dead, California Is Free to Sell Stem Cell Bonds. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;5/18/2007, Vol. 360 Issue 32632, p40 

    The article reports on the sale of bonds to finance medical research using stem cells as soon as it is practical after the demise of a lawsuit that had delayed them for more than two years in California. Voters have approved Proposition 71 authorizing $3 billion of general obligation bonds for...

  • No avoidance. Greene, Chris; Maddalena, Christina // Accountancy;Feb1995, Vol. 115 Issue 1218, p111 

    Discusses the ruling on the British tax avoidance case "IRC v. Willoughby," concerning a taxpayer's acquisition of single-premium personal portfolio bonds from an offshore fund. Crown's direct appeal against the Special Commissioner's decision; Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland's decision in...

  • Indiana Road Deal Opponents to Appeal Ruling on Posting Bond. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;5/30/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32391, p41 

    The article reports that the group behind a lawsuit challenging Indiana's plan to lease the Indiana Toll Road to a private consortium said it would appeal a Saint Joseph Superior Court judge Michael Scopelitis's ruling that requires the group to post a $1.9 billion bond to proceed. Scopelitis in...

  • Stephens Asks Appeals Court to Uphold Dismissal of FSA Charges. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;5/4/2005, Vol. 352 Issue 32125, p4 

    The article reports that in a closely watched bond insurance case, Stephens Inc. this week asked a federal appeals court to uphold a lower court's decision dismissing securities fraud charges brought against it by Financial Security Assurance Inc., claiming the "litigation is an effort by FSA to...

  • Out-of-State Decision. DeSue, Tedra // Bond Buyer;10/26/2006, Vol. 358 Issue 32495, p33 

    The article reports on the pending case involving the legality of a state taxing interest on out-of-state bonds in North Carolina. It highlights the ruling made by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in a lawsuit brought by two Forsyth County taxpayers. Taxpayers Leslie Dunn and Erwin Cook...

  • Noted Institutes Unite for Stem Cell Funding. Weeks, Katie // San Diego Business Journal;3/20/2006, Vol. 27 Issue 12, p1 

    The article reports that the collaboration of the four research centers which include Scripps Research Institute, Burnham Institute, Salk Institute, and University of California San Diego which was expected to be announced on March 17, 2006 is likely have to wait for the outcome of two lawsuits...

  • Abuse of Justice. Shariff, M. Y. // Economic & Political Weekly;6/28/2014, Vol. 49 Issue 26/27, p5 

    Two letters to the editor are presented in response to the article "Akshardham Judgment I: The Law at Work" by Ravi Nair and "Akshardam: Judgment II: Between Callousness and Complicity" by Saurav Datta in the June 21, 2014 issue.

  • Court of Appeal to rule on Brightlingsea dispute over restrictive covenant. Dyer, Clare // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);5/10/1986, Vol. 292 Issue 6530, p1242 

    Focuses on the court case on brightlingsea dispute over restrictive covenant. Ruling of the Court of Appeals on the case; Notification of retirement; Recollection of previous High Court decision.

  • Excerpts From Ruling in Richmond V. J.A. Croson Company.  // Education Week;2/1/1989, Vol. 8 Issue 19, p20 

    Several excerpts from the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in "City of Richmond versus J.A. Croson Co." are presented.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics