Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials

Edwards, Sarah J L
May 1999
BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);05/22/99, Vol. 318 Issue 7195, p1407
Academic Journal
Discusses ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomized controlled trials. Arguments for randomization by cluster; Who consents to trial entry; Evaluating cluster intervention; Conclusion.


Related Articles

  • Disclosure of individual research results in clinico-genomic trials: challenges, classification and criteria for decision-making. Kollek, Regine; Petersen, Imme // Journal of Medical Ethics;May2011, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p271 

    While an ethical obligation to report findings of clinical research to trial participants is increasingly recognised, the academic debate is often vague about what kinds of data should be fed back and how such a process should be organised. In this article, we present a classification of...

  • Early discontinuation violates Helsinki principles. Boyd, K // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);03/10/2001, Vol. 322 Issue 7286, p605 

    Offers the author's thoughts on early discontinuation of clinical trials, as a violation of the Declaration of Helsinki, which states that new medical treatments should always be tested against the best current method, when one exists. Ethical concerns of prematurely ending trials; Correlation...

  • Surprise! You're in a clinical trial!  // Prevention;Aug2007, Vol. 59 Issue 8, p34 

    The author reports that people are sometimes put into clinical trials without being aware of it. This happened to 15,000 people in the United States and Canada who were selected for clinical trials without being asked. Critics of this practice worry that patients' rights are being abused. To...

  • Can unequal be more fair? A response to Andrew Avins. Edwards, Sarah J L; Braunholtz, David A // Journal of Medical Ethics;Jun2000, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p179 

    In this paper, we respond to Andrew Avins's recent review of methods whose use he advocates in clinical trials, to make them more ethical He recommends in particular, "unbalanced randomisation". However, we argue that, before such a recommendation can be made, it is important to establish why...

  • The Roots of Regulations. Ganter, Jane // Applied Clinical Trials;Apr2001, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p12 

    Introduces an article on the experience of a clinical trial volunteer published in the April 2001 issue of 'Applied Clinical Trials,' and reflects on the volunteer's experience from the ethical point of view. Differences of the article from the periodical's previous articles dealing with...

  • The Ethical Foundations of Clinical Trials. Sharp, S. Michael // Applied Clinical Trials;Apr2001, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p48 

    Studies the ethical foundations of clinical trials. Parties involved in clinical trials; Examples of clinical trials that offer no benefit to subjects; Informed consent in clinical trials; Ethical principles and guidelines developed by various organizations to protect clinical trial subjects. ...

  • Clinical Trials: Finding Balance In Randomization. Reynolds, Tom // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;03/01/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 5, p370 

    Reports on the issues pertaining to randomized clinical trials. Views of ethicists and clinical researchers on trials; How the ethical tensions can be eliminated from randomized trials.

  • Medical researchers' ancillary clinical care responsibilities. Belsky, Leah; Richardson, Henry S. // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);6/19/2004, Vol. 328 Issue 7454, p1494 

    Debates whether medical researchers have a duty during clinical trials to treat conditions in trial participants that are unrelated to the study. Statement that existing guidelines on research ethics do not consider ancillary clinical care; Definition of ancillary care as that which is not...

  • Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: Personal, communal and proxy. Alderson, Priscilla // Journal of Medical Ethics;Jun96, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p135 

    Discusses the results of a study of professional and public views on equipoise, a means of achieving high scientific and ethical standards in randomized medical trials. Interview of patients and doctors who participated in breast cancer trials; Whether equipoise is possible for individual...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics