Climate Change: Observations on EPA's April 1999 Climate Change Report: RCED-99-235R

July 1999
GAO Reports;7/14/1999, p1
Government Documents
Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Climate Change Report, which was submitted to the Senate Committee on Appropriations in April 1999, focusing on the extent to which it: (1) provides a comprehensive explanation of the agency's climate change programs for fiscal year (FY) 2000; (2) justifies requested increases in funding for that fiscal year; (3) explains how the climate change activities are justified independently of the Kyoto Protocol; and (4) includes performance measures and goals and similar elements, as would be required by the Government Performance and Results Act. GAO noted that: (1) EPA's report on its climate change programs is not comprehensive and provides little information about its programs' funding and expected results; (2) the report covers seven of the nine broad initiatives listed in EPA's FY 2000 budget justification for climate change programs, which account for about $240 million; (3) the report does not discuss two broad initiatives, which account for about $23 million, or about 10 percent, of EPA's total request for climate change programs; (4) according to an agency official, EPA understood the Committee's directive as relating only to programs that are part of the Climate Change Technology Initiative and omitted the two broad initiatives that are not part of the technology initiative; (5) whereas the directive was linked to the technology initiative, the colloquy called for a comprehensive explanation of the agency's programs; (6) GAO read the colloquy as seeking information on all of the agency's climate change programs, not just those that are part of the technology initiative; (7) the report generally provides data on funding and expected results only for the broad initiatives but does not explain how the individual programs that make up the initiatives will contribute to the initiatives' expected results; (8) although EPA was directed in the colloquy to issue the report by the time it submitted its FY 2000 budget justification, the report was not issued until April 8, 1999, about 2 months late; (9) EPA's report does not provide justifications for the proposed funding increases for individual climate change programs for FY 2000; (10) instead, it provides justifications only for the total funding level requested, and this for only four of the six initiatives for which an increase was requested; (11) for the other two of the six initiatives for which an increase was requested, the report does not provide estimates of the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions expected to result from the combined requested increase of $13.8 million or explain why there are no such estimates; (12) EPA's report explains that its climate change activities are justified by long-standing agency goals and objectives and are not intended to implement the December 1997 Kyoto Protocol; (13) the report explains that these activities are justified by an international convention on climate change that was ratified by the Senate in 1992 and by seven specific environmental laws that EPA implements; and (14) EPA's report includes information on performance measures and goals and related information, which is similar to the information required by the Results Act.


Related Articles

  • Personnel Practices: Reimbursable Interagency Details: GGD-99-172R.  // GAO Reports;8/24/1999, p1 

    GAO identified weaknesses in the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) personnel practices. GAO noted that: (1) several agencies, including EPA, had detailed employees to the Small Business Administration (SBA) on a reimbursable basis but had not billed SBA for reimbursement; (2) according to...

  • Brownfields: Information on the Programs of EPA and Selected States: GAO-01-52.  // GAO Reports;12/15/2000, p1 

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and several states reviewed by GAO have established financial assistance programs to encourage the assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of brownfields. The programs run by EPA and the states differ in certain aspects, however. Namely, there are...

  • EPA CWA Budgeting Deemed Inadequate.  // WaterWorld;Sep2005, Vol. 21 Issue 9, p8 

    Reports on the U.S. General Accounting Office's (GAO) criticism against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) process for budgeting and allocating resources to meet its workload under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Total number of facilities that should be regulated by the EPA and states...

  • Not all EPA rules are being seen by outsiders, GAO report charges.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;10/28/96, Vol. 237 Issue 18, p20 

    Presents the US General Accounting Office's (GAO) finding concerning the use of scientific peer review in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Failure of EPA to implement a 1994 policy on scientific and technical work review by outside experts; EPA's inadequate mechanisms for peer review.

  • GAO Finds NPL Is Making Progress.  // Chemical Market Reporter;09/27/99, Vol. 256 Issue 13, p44 

    Reports that the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency has cleaned up or is close to completing work at most of the Superfund sites on the agency's National Priorities List (NPL). Findings of the US General Accounting Office (GAO) on the work; Expectation of the GAO on the agency...

  • Climate Change: Observations on EPA's March 2000 Climate Change Report: RCED-00-166R. Guerrero, Peter F. // GAO Reports;6/5/2000, p1 

    Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO provided information on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) March 2000 climate change report, focusing on: (1) the agency's climate change programs for fiscal year (FY) 2001; (2) the programs' goals, strategies, and procedures to verify and...

  • Superfund Program: Updated Appropriation and Expenditure Data: GAO-04-475R. Stephenson, John B. // GAO Reports;2/18/2004, p1 

    This report contains GAO's update of the appropriation and expenditure data for the Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund program since a July 2003 report. Total Superfund program appropriations decreased from fiscal year 1993 to fiscal year 2004, in constant 2003 dollars, from $1,903...

  • Water Quality: Program Enhancements Would Better Ensure Adequacy of Boat Pumpout Facilities in No-Discharge Zones: GAO-04-613. Stephenson, John B. // GAO Reports;5/24/2004, p1 

    Clean Water Act regulations generally prohibit boats from discharging untreated sewage but allow the discharge of treated sewage using certified marine sanitation devices. The act allows states to designate "no-discharge zones"--areas in which vessels are prohibited from discharging any...

  • Environmental Protection: EPA's and States' Efforts to Focus State Enforcement Programs on Results: RCED-98-113.  // GAO Reports;5/27/1998, p1 

    Most major environmental statutes allow the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to delegate the responsibility for key programs to qualified states. In order for states to obtain such responsibility, they generally are required to have adequate authority to inspect, monitor, and enforce the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics