Superfund Program: Current Status and Future Fiscal Challenges: GAO-03-850

July 2003
GAO Reports;7/31/2003, p1
Government Documents
Congress established the Superfund program in 1980 to clean up highly contaminated hazardous waste sites. Among other things, the law established a trust fund to help the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pay for cleanups and related program activities. The trust fund was financed primarily by three dedicated taxes until 1995, when the taxing authority expired. EPA continues to discover sites eligible for cleanup under the Superfund program. GAO was asked to examine the current status of the Superfund program, the factors guiding EPA's selection of sites to be placed on its National Priorities List, and the program's future outlook. The balance of the Superfund trust fund available for future appropriations has decreased significantly since 1996, while highly contaminated hazardous waste sites continue to be added to the National Priorities List (NPL), EPA's list of the nation's most contaminated sites. A decline in revenues to the trust fund has led the Superfund program to rely increasingly on appropriations from the general fund. In EPA's fiscal year 2004 budget request for the Superfund program, the general fund appropriation would make up about 80 percent of the program's total appropriation. At the end of fiscal year 2002, the NPL had 1,233 sites in various stages of cleanup. EPA considers many factors in selecting from the sites that are eligible to be listed, the most prominent of which are the availability of alternative federal or state programs that could be used to clean up the site, the status of responsible parties associated with the sites, and the cost and complexity of the cleanup required. As the Superfund program continues to add sites to the NPL and funding sources shift toward general fund appropriations, the effect of EPA's actions to address future program challenges remains uncertain. Because Superfund lacks indicators to fully measure the outcomes of the program's cleanup efforts, EPA has asked an advisory council to develop criteria by which to measure the program's progress. However, it is unclear whether the advisory council will reach consensus on its recommendations, and its findings are not expected until December 2003, at the earliest. Performance indicators could help EPA and the Congress make the difficult funding, policy, and program decisions that the current budget environment demands.


Related Articles

  • EPA Unveils a Program To Clean Up Sites That Manage Hazardous Wastes. Hess, Glenn // Chemical Market Reporter;07/12/99, Vol. 256 Issue 2, p1 

    Reports that the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency has launched a major initiative to speed the cleanup of toxic contamination throughout the country. Information on the cleanup program for active industrial facilities under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Findings...

  • EPA'S SUPERFUND REFORM FAULTED.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;06/26/2000, Vol. 244 Issue 25, p24 

    Deals with a report from the United States General Accounting Office which found that the reforms of the Superfund hazardous waste cleanup program of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have not been as successful as EPA claimed. Number of Superfund reforms classified by the EPA as having...

  • GAO: More Than Half of Superfund Spending Goes to Administration. Harrigan, Kate // Pollution Engineering;Nov98, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p16 

    Focuses on the call by Congressman Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.) on the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reduce the amount of Superfund that goes to administrative costs. Remarks from Frelinghuysen; Findings of the US General Accounting Office (GAO) on the percentage...

  • 'EPA Is Back on the Job'.  // National Journal;2/28/2009, p15 

    An interview with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator Lisa Jackson is presented. She cites her plan for getting her work done with fewer resources. Also discussed are her priorities as administrator, one of which is to restore science and its role in writing regulations and...

  • `Immediate attention'.  // New Hampshire Business Review;8/02/96, Vol. 18 Issue 16, p29 

    Reports on the additional funds awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the asbestos-removal efforts at the Johns-Manville hazardous waste site in Nashua, New Hampshire. Total cost of the cleanup; Site's failure to qualify for EPA's brownfield grant.

  • Clean up the crud.  // New Hampshire Business Review;10/11/96, Vol. 18 Issue 21, p20 

    Reports that Concord, New Hampshire has received a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to study the proposed cleanup of hazardous waste-contaminated industrial sites in the city. Eligibility of Concord's `crud corridor' for the grant under the EPA's brownfields pilot...

  • EPA issues study on cleanup technologies.  // R&D Magazine;Mar96, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p9 

    Reports that the United States Environmental Protection Agency, have published a book, covering the cleanup methods for hazardous waste sites. 7th edition of Innovative Treatment Technologies; Details of book.

  • Site cleanup progress.  // Congressional Digest;Mar1998, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p72 

    Focuses on some of the methods employed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an attempt to cleanup hazardous waste sites, while highlighting the enactment of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. Effect of the Act on...

  • EPA estimates Michigan PCB cleanup cost at $15 million. Johnson, Jim // Waste News;10/28/2002, Vol. 8 Issue 14, p4 

    Reports on the clean-up cost of a contaminated site at Allegan in Michigan estimated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Contaminants at the site; Contaminated areas at the site; Company that owns the site.


Read the Article

Other Topics