Observations on the National Science Foundation's Fiscal Year 1999 Performance Report and Fiscal Year 2001 Performance Plan: RCED-00-205R

June 2000
GAO Reports;6/1/2000, p1
Government Documents
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the National Science Foundation's (NSF) fiscal year (FY) 1999 performance report and FY 2001 performance plan. GAO noted that: (1) NSF's FY 1999 performance report demonstrates that NSF was generally successful in achieving the outcome involving "discoveries at and across the frontier of science and engineering" in research areas such as biology, Arctic and Antarctic research, and discoveries in how the young learn; (2) NSF judged its performance as successful on the basis of: (a) program reviews by independent committees; and (b) examples of outstanding science chosen to show NSF's achievements; (3) the performance report, however, sheds little light on the quality of committees' reports, and NSF officials acknowledged that the quality of these reports varied; (4) as a result, in its FY 2001 performance plan, NSF cites numerous shortcomings in the committees' program evaluations; (5) like the committees' reports, the FY 1999 performance report also fails to describe NSF's financial role in the examples of scientific successes presented; (6) despite these limitations, the performance report adequately condenses the committees' numerous program reports which in turn reflect NSF's accomplishments with regard to this outcome; (7) NSF's FY 1999 performance report indicates clear progress toward achieving the goals embodied in the second key outcome, "administer research grants efficiently and effectively;" (8) the outcome, while not explicitly included among NSF's outcomes in its FY 1999 and 2000 performance plans, may be inferred from several performance goals that are included in its investment and management process goals; (9) the included goals and measures are generally objective and quantifiable; (10) the performance report adequately reflects that NSF achieved some, but not all, of these goals; (11) NSF's FY 1999 performance report and FY 2001 performance plan discussed 2 of 10 major management challenges identified by NSF's Inspector General (IG) but did not address directly or indirectly the other 8 challenges; (12) the report and plan addressed NSF's progress in managing an effective merit review system and implementing a new electronic proposal and award information system; (13) the IG no longer considers these issues as major challenges but stressed the need for NSF to be alert to emerging situations that could result in them becoming a problem; (14) the IG said that NSF was taking effective steps to respond to these challenges and did not need to include them in the performance report or future performance plans; and (15) however, the IG continues to be concerned about the four remaining challenges that the performance report did not discuss.


Related Articles

  • Grant Financial System Requirements: JFMIP-SR-00-3.  // GAO Reports;6/1/2000, p1 

    GAO published a functional requirements document for grant financial systems. This document is intended for systems analyst, systems accountants, and others who design, develop, implement, operate, and maintain financial management systems.

  • Research and Development Funding: Reported Gap Between Data From Federal Agencies and Their R&D Performers Results From Noncomparable Data: GAO-01-512R.  // GAO Reports;5/9/2001, p1 

    A January report by the National Science Foundation (NSF) identified a $5 billion gap between the amount of money that federal agencies reported as research and development (R&D) support and the amount of money that those who did the R&D work reported as spent in 1998. According to NSF, federal...

  • Grants Management: Despite Efforts to Improve Weed and Seed Program Management, Challenges Remain: GAO-04-245. Ekstrand, Laurie E. // GAO Reports;3/24/2004, p1 

    The Weed and Seed program, within the Department of Justice's Office of Justice Programs (OJP), aims to prevent and reduce violent crime in targeted neighborhoods, but it cannot optimize its effectiveness without sound management practices. In 1999, GAO made four recommendations to the Executive...

  • Plant genomics' ascent. Waltz, Emily // Nature Biotechnology;Jan2010, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p10 

    The article reports on the increase in the amount of grants supporting plant genome research in the U.S. with funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) valued at nearly 102 million U.S. dollars. The stated objective of the funding is to increase understanding of plant gene function and...

  • Federal Assistance: Grant System Continues to Be Highly Fragmented: GAO-03-718T. Posner, Paul L. // GAO Reports;4/29/2003, p1 

    The Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999 is one of the most recent in a series of efforts to reform the federal grants management system. The act seeks to improve the effectiveness and performance of Federal financial assistance programs; simplify application and...

  • Internet grants.  // Science Teacher;Apr99, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p64 

    Announces that the National Science Foundation's grant program entitled `Connections to the Internet' is accepting proposals from educational institutions, libraries and museums in the United States. Proposal requirements.

  • NSF awards $18.5M for new engineering research center.  // Medical Device Daily;7/19/2011, Vol. 15 Issue 133, p4 

    The article offers information on a grant amounting to 18.5 million U.S. dollars awarded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to eight institutions which include the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the construction of an engineering research center for sensorimotor neural engineering.

  • Peer review on trial. Davis, Harold L. // Physics Today;Sep75, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p96 

    Comments on the peer-review process of the U.S. National Science Foundation. Importance of the peer review process for granting funds; Question on the confidentiality of the review process; Criticism on the peer review.

  • NSF fosters interdisciplinary training.  // Industrial Engineer: IE;Dec2007, Vol. 39 Issue 12, p11 

    The article reports on the financial support given by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to the Cornell Center for Materials Research (CCMR) for its new graduate student training program. The grant is worth $2.9 million from the NSF's Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics