Defense Acquisitions: Higher Level DOD Review of Antiarmor Mission and Munitions Is Needed: GAO-01-607

June 2001
GAO Reports;6/8/2001, p1
Government Documents
The Department of Defense (DOD) issued antiarmor munitions master plans beginning in 1985 and updated the plans annually until 1990. These antiarmor plans focused on the Cold War armored threat and on the weapons that would be needed to prevail in a Central European Scenario. Congress expressed concern that the military continued to develop and procure an increasing number of tank-killing weapons at a time when potential adversaries had smaller numbers of armored forces. Congress told DOD to develop an Antiarmor Munitions Master Plan to identify the projected armor threat and the projected quantity of all antiarmor weapons, with the purpose of identifying and eliminating excess anti armor capability. This report reviews the plan to determine if it provides the data and analysis specified in the Fiscal Year 2000 Defense Appropriations conference report and provides data and analysis needed to support the services' current antiarmor acquisition plans. GAO found that DOD's July 2000 Antiarmor Munitions Master Plan did not provide the data and analysis specified in the Fiscal Year 2000 Defense Appropriations conference report. The plan provided limited data and analysis to support the services' current antiarmor acquisition plans. In January 2001, DOD stated that, in anticipation of the Quadrennial Defense Review, the Army had begun several studies and analyses to more clearly define an economically sound and operationally effective mix of munitions.


Related Articles

  • Defense Manufacturing Technology Program: More Joint Projects and Tracking of Results Could Benefit Program: GAO-01-943.  // GAO Reports;9/28/2001, p1 

    The Department of Defense (DOD) established the Defense Manufacturing Technology Program to develop and apply advanced manufacturing technologies to reduce the total cost and improve the manufacturing quality of weapon systems. By maturing and validating emerging manufacturing technology and...

  • Procurement up 8% this year. Mann, Paul // Aviation Week & Space Technology;10/25/1999, Vol. 151 Issue 17, p37 

    Reports on the increase of weapons procurement funding in the United States in Fiscal 2000 if the defense appropriations bill survives a veto threat. Recommended Fiscal 2000 appropriations for major weapons; Funding for the Pentagon's research, development, test and evaluation; Aviation...

  • Archaic Buying Breeds Exorbitant Arms Prices. Mann, Paul // Aviation Week & Space Technology;5/1/2000, Vol. 152 Issue 18, p26 

    Focuses the additional costs of purchasing military weapons in the United States due to the antiquated procurement system of the US Department of Defense according to legislative findings. Estimates of the additional costs; Problems in procurement made worse by turnover uncertainty and lack of...

  • Zero-base budget for defense. Davis, Harold L. // Physics Today;Jan79, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p136 

    Editorial. Focuses on the budget for military defense in the U.S. Debate over missile-destroying ray weapons; Need for the involvement of decision makers into the business of cost-benefit analyses of alternative defense options; Information on how to accomplish the legitimate missions of the...

  • Lawmakers Likely To Keep House Requirements Guiding FCS Program. DiMascio, Jen // Defense Daily;9/18/2006, Vol. 231 Issue 51, p2 

    The article reports the provisions that the U.S. Congress set upon the Army's Future Combat System program, which is stipulated in the final version the fiscal 2007 Defense Authorization Bill. The country's legislator agreed to keep language in the House bill that requires the Army to fully fund...

  • Walker: Practice of Overselling Weapons Systems Drives Up Acquisition Costs. DiMascio, Jen // Defense Daily;9/8/2006, Vol. 231 Issue 45, p2 

    The article considers the claim of David Walker of the Government Accountability Office that the U.S. defense acquisition officials have a tendency to overpromise how much major weapons systems can deliver to get buy in from the government. The trend is one of the factors that contribute to the...

  • Acquisition Workforce: Department of Defense's Plans to Address Workforce Size and Structure Challenges: GAO-02-630.  // GAO Reports;4/30/2002, p1 

    The Department of Defense (DOD) downsized its acquisition workforce by half in the past decade. It now faces serious imbalances in the skills and experience of its remaining workforce and the potential loss of highly specialized knowledge if many of its acquisition specialists retire. DOD...

  • Canceled DOD Appropriations: Improvements Made but More Corrective Actions Are Needed: GAO-02-747.  // GAO Reports;7/31/2002, p1 

    Congress changed the law governing the use of appropriation accounts in 1990 because it found that the Department of Defense (DOD) may have spent hundreds of millions of dollars for purposes that Congress had not approved. The 1990 law provided that, 5 years after the expiration of the period of...

  • Defense Inventory: Trends in Services' Spare Parts Purchased from the Defense Logistics Agency: GAO-02-452.  // GAO Reports;4/30/2002, p1 

    The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) reported that a shortage of spare parts has caused a decline in the military services' readiness, particularly in aviation readiness. In response, Congress provided $1.1 billion in additional funding to purchase spare parts. According to DLA, shortages are a...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics