Farmer Mac: Greater Attention to Risk Management, Mission, Public Purpose, and Corporate Governance Is Needed: GAO-04-827T

D'Agostino, Davi M.; Franzel, Jeanette
June 2004
GAO Reports;6/2/2004, p1
Government Document
This testimony is based on GAO's October 2003 report, Farmer Mac: Some Progress Made, but Greater Attention to Risk Management, Mission, and Corporate Governance Is Needed (GAO-04-116). GAO's testimony presents a brief overview of Farmer Mac and discusses issues raised in its 2003 report, including Farmer Mac's risk management practices and line of credit with Treasury, mission related activities, board structure, and oversight, which is provided by the Farm Credit Administration (FCA). Farmer Mac, a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE), was established to provide a secondary market for agricultural real estate and rural housing loans and to increase agricultural mortgage credit. In 2003, GAO reported that several aspects of Farmer Mac's financial risk management practices had not kept pace with its increasing risk profile. First, Farmer Mac had $3.1 billion in off-balance-sheet commitments and other agreements that could obligate it to buy the underlying loans or cover related losses under certain conditions. Farmer Mac and the Farm Credit System institutions that participate in the agreements are required to hold far less capital than is otherwise required. Because Farmer Mac's loan activities are concentrated in a small number of financial institutions and in the West, the risk is not reduced while less capital is required to be held. Under stressful agricultural economic conditions, Farmer Mac could be required to purchase large amounts of impaired or defaulted loans if large amounts of the commitments were exercised. Second, the coverage of Farmer Mac's $1.5 billion line of credit with the U.S. Treasury was controversial, as the entities disagreed on whether the securities it has issued and kept in its portfolio would be eligible. Third, GAO reported that while Farmer Mac had increased its mission-related activities since its 1999 report, their impact on the agricultural real estate market was unclear. The effects were difficult to measure partly because Farmer Mac's statute lacks specific mission goals. For this and other reasons, GAO concluded that the public benefits derived from Farmer Mac's activities are not clear. Finally, for profitability reasons, Farmer Mac had a strategy of holding securities it issued in its portfolio instead of selling them to investors in the capital markets. As a result, the depth and liquidity of the market for Farmer Mac's securities is unknown. Farmer Mac's board structure, set in federal law, may make it difficult to ensure that the board fully represents the interests of all shareholders and meets independence and other requirements. The board structure contains elements of both a cooperative and an investor-owned publicly traded company. For example, two-thirds of the board members do business with Farmer Mac and hold the only voting stock, while the common stock holders have no vote. GAO also identified challenges FCA faced in its oversight of Farmer Mac, including a lack of specific criteria for measuring how well it was achieving its mission. Although FCA had taken steps to improve its safety and soundness oversight, more needs to be done to improve its offsite monitoring and assessment of risk-based capital. Farmer Mac and FCA have efforts underway to address many of GAO's recommendations and it was too early to assess them.


Related Articles

  • Critical Needs. POWELL, DOUG // Information Security;Nov2012, Vol. 14 Issue 9, p29 

    The article discusses the need for governance, risk and compliance (GRC) management to adapt in addressing critical infrastructure (CI) protection needs. According to the author, GRC management still has to adapt in a comprehensive way in dealing with two pressing concerns namely, the need for...

  • Taking Smart Risks. Tracy, Brian // National Public Accountant;Sep2003, p41 

    Provides tips on taking an intelligent risk when it comes to business. Types of risk; Assessment of the worst possible outcome if the risk is taken; Importance of making a list of actions to take to offset the negative factors contributing to the risk.

  • Global regulation steers towards quality. Newatia, Vikas // Asia Insurance Review;Apr2009, p106 

    The article explores the impact of the global credit crunch to the increase of quantitative rules-based tests. It notes that business establishments uses two core-related strands such as principles-based regulation and Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Principles-based regulations will be used...

  • Meeting The Challenge Of Entrepreneurial Risk. Richards, R. M. // Risk Management (00355593);May84, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p22 

    The article stresses the need to broaden the definition of risk management to include its application to all types of risk and not just pure risk. At the heart of this shift in focus is the fact that chief executive officers of many corporations are beginning to realize the value of the risk...

  • The Newest Buzz At Companies? 'Risk Management On Steroids'. Connolly, Jim // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;10/18/2004, Vol. 108 Issue 39, p25 

    Focuses on the role of identifying risk and determining risk appetite as reasons to implement Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) in the insurance industry in the United States. Industry's concern over Section 404 requirements for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; Role of ERM in assisting companies...

  • A Further Examination of the Relationship between Contract Administration Problems and Contract Type. Davison, Bill; Sebastian, Richard J.; Borger, Tina M. // Journal of Management Research;Jan2013, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p214 

    This new research supports the 2006 research conducted by Davison and Sebastian (Davison-Sebastian 2007) that data is available for, each type of contract, the likelihood of contract administration problems occurring and the consequences of these problems if they do occur. With this data the...

  • Risk Management Adoption Framework for Software Projects: A Case Study for Kenyan Software Project Managers and Developers. Kipyegen, Noela Jemutai; Mwangi, Waweru; Kimani, Stephen // International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI);May2012, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p365 

    Despite the existence and availability of proper software development risk management processes, Kenyan's software projects experience myriad of challenges. This study looks at software risk management practice and the root of problems experienced by Kenyan software project managers and...

  • Embracing ERM.  // Asia Insurance Review;Jul2007, p50 

    The article discusses enterprise risk management (ERM) and how it converges all the elements of risk management across an entire organization in Australia. It relates that ERM is a holistic and comprehensive approach to risk management that allows for identification of how much risk an...

  • HOW TO KEEP HUMPTY DUMPTY ON THE TOP OF YOUR WALL. Feuer, Michael // Smart Business Orange County;May2011, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p30 

    The author shares his views regarding the efforts adopted by some companies to fix big problems which could be prevented if certain measures are taken. He expresses his dismay to those companies that are only using risk management programs which involve assessing potential dangers to issues that...


Read the Article

Other Topics