Military Base Closures: Observations on Preparations for the Upcoming Base Realignment and Closure Round: GAO-04-558T

Holman, Barry W.
March 2004
GAO Reports;3/25/2004, p1
Government Document
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 authorized an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round in 2005. The legislation requires the Department of Defense (DOD) to provide Congress in early 2004 with a report that addresses excess infrastructure and certifies that an additional BRAC round is needed and that annual net savings will be realized by each military department not later than fiscal year 2011. GAO is required to assess this information as well as the selection criteria for the 2005 round and report to Congress within 60 days of DOD's submission. The legislation also retains the requirement for GAO to assess the BRAC 2005 decisionmaking process and resulting recommendations. This testimony addresses (1) the BRAC process from a historical perspective, (2) GAO's role in the process, and (3) GAO's initial observations on key issues DOD is required to address in preparation for the 2005 round. Because DOD had not submitted its required 2004 report at the time we completed this statement, this testimony relies on our prior work that addressed issues associated with excess capacity and BRAC savings. GAO's work in examining lessons learned from prior BRAC rounds found that the prior legislation and the framework it outlined served the process well, and that it should provide a useful framework for a future round. Furthermore, the legislation and its implementation provided for checks and balances to ensure the integrity of the process. GAO has played a long-standing role as an independent and objective observer of the BRAC process. GAO has operated in a real-time setting and has had access to significant portions of the process as it has evolved, thus affording DOD an early opportunity to address any concerns GAO might identify. GAO's role in the 2005 round remains the same, and GAO has been observing the process since DOD began work on the 2005 round. Timely access to DOD data is key to fulfilling GAO's role. GAO's initial observations on key issues DOD is required to address in its 2004 report are as follows. The selection criteria for the 2005 round are basically sound and provide a good framework for assessing alternatives. Nevertheless, GAO provided DOD with comments on the draft criteria that focused on the need for clarification of how DOD intends to consider total costs to DOD and other federal agencies and environmental costs in its analyses. The department has indicated that it would be issuing clarifying guidance. DOD plans to estimate its excess capacity using a methodology that it used in 1998 for similar purposes. While this methodology provides a rough indication of excess capacity for selected functional areas, it has a number of limitations that create imprecision when trying to project a total amount of excess capacity across DOD. A more complete assessment of capacity and the potential to reduce it must await the results of the current BRAC analyses being conducted by DOD during the 2005 round. DOD financial data suggest that, assuming conditions similar to those in the 1993 and 1995 BRAC rounds, each military department could achieve annual net savings by 2011. While we believe that the potential exists for significant savings to result from the 2005 round, there are simply too many unknowns at this time to say conclusively to what extent annual net savings will be realized by 2011. For example, in 2005 DOD is placing increased emphasis on jointness and transformation and is likely to use BRAC to incorporate any force redeployments from overseas locations that may result from ongoing overseas basing reassessments. This suggests a need for caution in projecting the timing and amount of savings from a new BRAC round.


Related Articles

  • Military Bases: Status of Prior Base Realignment and Closure Rounds: NSIAD-99-36.  // GAO Reports;12/11/1998, p1 

    By September 1998, the Defense Department (DOD) had completed actions on about 85 percent of the 451 recommendations made by the four base realignment and closure commissions. DOD declared about 464,000 acres of base property as excess. Forty-six percent of the unneeded property was to be kept...

  • DoD Proposes Additional BRAC Measures.  // Army Magazine;May2012, Vol. 62 Issue 5, p8 

    The article reports on the opposition to the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) proposal that the Congress authorize two additional Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) rounds in fiscal years 2013 and 2015 to reduce the defense budget. It warns that the Pentagon will use its own authority to close...

  • "PERFECT STORM" Is Raging in Washington, D.C. Starr, Jim // Officer;Jun2005, Vol. 82 Issue 5, p26 

    Comments on the impact of the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission on the tranformation of the U.S. Department of Defense. Criteria used for bases closure; Goals for the transformation of all military services.

  • As we navigate through BRAC process, taking care of our people is top priority. Bradley, John A. // Citizen Airman: The Official Magazine of the Air National Guard ;Jun2005, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p2 

    Reports on the United States Department of Defense's completion of its Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process. Features of the agency's BRAC program; Impact of BRAC on the country's defense and security status; Importance of public and community support on the success of BRAC.

  • Connecting the Dots -- Transforming Today's Military Health System For Tomorrow's Needs. Winkenwerder, William // Military Medicine;Summer2005 Supplement, p3 

    The article focuses on the importance of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process of the U.S. Department of Defense to the Military Health System (MHS). It says that the process evaluates the healthcare services of the MHS and analyzes the ways to better serve the U.S. Armed Forces. The goal...

  • BRAC 2005: It's About the Future, Not the Past. Helmly, James R. // Officer;Jul/Aug2005, Vol. 82 Issue 6, p34 

    Discusses the U.S. Department of Defense's recommendation for Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC). Author's belief that BRAC 2005 provides an opportunity for the Army Reserve to change for the better; Explanation of the BRAC process.

  • WHO KNEW?  // Government Executive;Apr2006, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p11 

    The article reports on the changes in workforce brought by the U.S. Department of Defense over the past few years. The Defense Department has reduced its civilian workforce by 400,000, since the first round of base closings in 1998. 20,000 military positions were converted to civilian jobs in...

  • Possible Base Closings Could Cut into Fitness Offerings. J. S. // Fitness Business Pro;Jun2005, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p17 

    Reports on speculation on the possible impact of the proposal to close 33 military bases on health facilities on those locations. Recommendations made by the United States Department of Defense; Unofficial list of bases; Comments of Air Force public affairs officer Steve VanWert.

  • Military Base Closures: Potential to Offset Fiscal Year 2000 Budget Request: NSIAD-99-149.  // GAO Reports;7/23/1999, p1 

    To fund the four rounds of military base closures and realignments carried out between 1988 and 1995, Congress established two accounts: the first to fund actions resulting from the first round in 1988 and the second, known as the 1990 account, to fund actions resulting from the next three...


Read the Article

Other Topics